Abstract 1489P
Background
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In recent years, the therapeutic landscape for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed with the rise of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Elderly patients represent approximately half of the patient population, but studies on the treatment of elderly patients are limited.
Methods
A retrospective collection of 244 patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC at APL General Hospital's First Medical Center and Fifth Medical Center, including 69 patients treated with immune monotherapy and 175 patients treated with combined immunotherapy. Cox regression analyses were used to assess whether there were differences in efficacy between immune monotherapy and combined immunotherapy.
Results
A total of 244 elderly patients were included in the study, and the analysis found that combined immunotherapy has a longer median OS. Patients with distant lung cancer metastases (HR 1.633, 95% CI 1.133-2.354), using immunotherapy as a second-line treatment (HR 1.717, 95% CI 1.238-2.380), and with pleural effusion (HR 1.772, 95% CI 1.246-2.522) had a shorter OS, whereas the patients treated with the combined immune therapy had a longer OS (HR 0.538, 95% CI 0.387-0.748). For patients aged 60-65 years with pleural effusion and second-line use of immunotherapy shortened OS. OS was shorter in patients aged 65-75 years with brain metastases and longer in patients receiving the combined immunotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI >24.8 and the use of combined immunotherapy were protective factors for OS and that the presence of pleural effusion was a risk factor. For patients aged 60 to 65 and 65 to 75, the presence of pleural effusion was a risk factor. Among patients >75 years, we only found a longer OS in patients with BMI >24.8(P=0.023).
Conclusions
For older patients with advanced NSCLC, the survival benefit of using combined immunotherapy is higher than that of immune monotherapy. However, that there was no difference in the efficacy of immune monotherapy or combined immunotherapy in this group (P =0.762), but patients with a BMI >24.8 had a longer OS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yunye Mao.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1535P - Paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus paclitaxel alone in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, refractory or intolerant to combination therapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs: Final results from the randomized phase II IKF-S627/RAMOS trial of the AIO
Presenter: Magdalena Scheck
Session: Poster session 21
1536P - HERIZON: A phase II study of HER-Vaxx (IMU-131), a HER2-targeting peptide vaccine plus standard of care chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ advanced stomach cancer - Dose-dependent anti-cancer antibodies correlating with improved clinical outcome
Presenter: Joshua Tobias
Session: Poster session 21
1537P - A phase I study of pevonedistat plus capeOX in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to platinum (NCCH-1811)
Presenter: Daisuke Takahari
Session: Poster session 21
1540P - Tislelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, phase II clinical study
Presenter: Yi Zhang
Session: Poster session 21
1541P - Neoadjuvant therapy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)
Presenter: Yinjun Dong
Session: Poster session 21
1542P - Updated results of a phase II clinical trial: Paclitaxel and carboplatin plus PD-1 blockades combined with anlotinib as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer
Presenter: Mingfang Xu
Session: Poster session 21