Abstract 231P
Background
Overall survival (OS) is the optimal marker of efficacy for evaluation of treatments in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) but can take a considerable amount of time to mature. Evaluation of changes in tumor size through objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) has served as an early surrogate of OS however they are imperfect. Time to deterioration (TTD) in quality of life (QoL) measures could act as an early alternative patient centered surrogate of OS.
Methods
We utilised published phase 3 RCTs in solid malignancies that reported OS, PFS, ORR, and time to deterioration (TTD) evaluations of overall QoL or physical function (PF) published between 1st of January 2010 and 30th of June 2022. Weighted regression analysis was utilised to assess the relationship between PFS, ORR ratio, TTD QoL and TTD PF with OS. The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to quantify surrogacy.
Results
After identifying 9109 publications, 138 studies with 86199 patients were included for analysis. 47 RCT involved immunotherapy (IO) whilst 91 investigated non-IO agents. PFS (R2= 0.19) and ORR (R2= 0.05) were poor surrogates of OS. TTD QoL and TTD PF was available in 137 and 75 RCTs respectively. In the respected subset of studies, TTD QoL (TTD QoL R2= 0.18 vs. PFS R2= 0.19) and TTD PF (TTD PF R2= 0.10 vs PFS R2= 0.09) performed similarly to PFS as surrogates of OS. However, for IO agents, TTD PF (R2= 0.38) had a higher surrogacy to OS compared to PFS (R2= 0.19). Furthermore, combining PFS and TTD PF enabled improved prediction of OS (R2= 0.57). Importantly, TTD PF and PFS were not correlated with each other (R2= 0). TTD PF was not a surrogate endpoint of OS for non-IO trials.
Conclusions
Our trial level analysis identified TTD in PF as a potential marker of early OS in trials that utilized IO agents. It could potentially be used in conjunction with PFS to improve surrogacy in specific tumor types. Our results are based on published results and should be validated using patient-level data.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
144P - Artificial intelligence supported treatment decisions for precision oncology
Presenter: Damian Rieke
Session: Poster session 01
145P - Identification of biomarkers of survival across multiple cancer types using eXplainable artificial intelligence
Presenter: Francesca Angileri
Session: Poster session 01
147P - Non-small cell lung cancer: Artificial intelligence enables the identification of survival signatures complementary to an Immunologically active gene expression signature involving previous therapies
Presenter: Pierre Saintigny
Session: Poster session 01
149P - Assessing the effect of single dose trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) on biological changes and pathological complete response (pCR) in ERBB2+ Breast Cancer: Results from the neoadjuvant BionHER study
Presenter: Nadia Gomez Serra
Session: Poster session 01
150P - Validation of a genomic assay in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer (BC) treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP): A correlative analysis from PHERGain phase II trial
Presenter: Antonio Llombart Cussac
Session: Poster session 01
152P - Efficacy of olaparib in advanced cancers with germline or somatic tumor mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and ATM: A Belgian precision tumor-agnostic phase II study
Presenter: Sofie Joris
Session: Poster session 01
153P - Descriptive analysis of the location of point mutations in BRCA and the risk of breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis
Presenter: Pablo Torres-Mozas
Session: Poster session 01
154P - Highly sensitive serum volatolomic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis and prognosis
Presenter: Alfredo Martínez
Session: Poster session 01