Abstract 1605P
Background
Pain is one of the most common symptoms experienced by cancer patients. Previous studies have shown that unrelieved cancer pain can affect the quality of life dramatically and is associated with worse survival in patients with cancer, including lung cancer. Non-opioid analgesics are often used in the management of cancer pain. Yet whether the usage of non-opioid analgesics can affect the survival of lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains undetermined.
Methods
We identified 910 patients with records of at least two cycles of ICI prescription with or without records of non-opioid analgesics prescription between 2018 and 2020 within the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System of Hong Kong. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients who received ICI with non-opioid analgesics versus those without.
Results
In total, 765 (84.1%) and 145 (15.9%) patients with lung cancer received ICI with or without non-opioid analgesics, respectively. The median follow-up time was 35.9 months (95% CI: 34.7-37.3 months). Patients with records of non-opioid analgesics prescriptions had significantly shorter OS than those without (13.4 vs 40.5 months, p < 0.0001). In Cox regression analysis, ICI with a history of non-opioid analgesics usage was associated with a significantly worse prognosis. (HR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.86-3.10, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Lung cancer patients who received ICI with a history of non-opioid analgesics usage had shorter survival than those without. Patients with a history of non-opioid analgesics usage are likely to have cancer pain or suboptimal tumour control, which were associated with a worse prognosis.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1999P - IMreal Cohort 4: Third interim analysis of efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (atezo + CE) as first-line (1L) therapy under real-world conditions (RWCs)
Presenter: Sanjay Popat
Session: Poster session 05
2000P - Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy after first-line immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A multi-center retrospective study
Presenter: Jiake Wu
Session: Poster session 05
2001P - Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in the era of chemoimmunotherapy: A retrospective analysis concerning patients from southern Italy
Presenter: Vito Longo
Session: Poster session 05
2002P - A multicentre study assessing the real-world effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients
Presenter: Marie Porte
Session: Poster session 05
2003P - Consolidative intrathoracic radiotherapy during maintenance first-line immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): A retrospective multicenter analysis of safety and efficacy
Presenter: Alessio Bruni
Session: Poster session 05
2004P - PD-L1 Inhibitors combined with whole brain radiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases: Real-world evidence
Presenter: Litang Huang
Session: Poster session 05
2005P - Anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of first-line extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): A real-world study
Presenter: Fangfang Gao
Session: Poster session 05
2006P - Immune activation effect and survival of different irradiated sites in ES-SCLC patients treated with radioimmunotherapy: A real-world analysis
Presenter: Min Wu
Session: Poster session 05
2007P - Real-world (rw) outcomes to chemoimmunotherapy and biomarker analysis in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES SCLC)
Presenter: Emmanouil Panagiotou
Session: Poster session 05