Abstract 481P
Background
SERDs are effective treatment options for breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) after progression on first-line therapy, especially for those harboring estrogen-receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations (mut). Several studies have explored the potential of SERDs to overcome endocrine resistance, yielding promising results.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess oral SERDs in hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative BC pts. Efficacy was evaluated by tumor response according to ESR1mut, and the number of pts with variant allele frequency (VAF) decreased with SERD therapy. We searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases and congress websites for randomized and non-randomized clinical trials. We used a random effects model for data pooling; heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.
Results
We included 19 studies with 1,798pts. Of 855 pts tested, 387 (45%) had ESR1mut. ESR1mut frequency and respective overall response rate (ORR) are described in the table. We found 80% of pts(95%CI 0.72-0.88 I256%) had a decrease in VAF with SERD therapy. The estimated risk of all-causality adverse events (AE) was 86% (95% CI 0.80-0.92), and grades 3 or 4 AE were 19% (95% CI 0.11-0.28). SERD plus Palbociclib resulted in higher rates of AEs (p<0.01). Elacestrant had numerically higher G3-4 AEs compared to the other SERD (p=0.05). The most common AEs were nausea (35%), diarrhea (30%), and fatigue (23%). Arthralgia was reported in 15%, and only 1% of pts had to discontinue treatment due to AE.
Table: 481P
Characterization of ESR1mut and response to SERD (amcenestrant, elacestrant, and camizestrant)
ESR1mut | Prevalence of ESR1mut(%) | Patients assessed for response(n) | ORR(%) |
D538G | 34 | 25 | 44 |
Y537S | 28 | 23 | 61 |
E380Q | 8 | 8 | 25 |
Y537N | 7 | 11 | 45 |
L536H | 6 | 4 | 75 |
Others | 16 | 13 | 15 |
Conclusions
Our study supports the favorable safety profile of the new generation oral SERD and presents its efficacy according to ESR1mut. Further studies shall assess the potential biomarker role of individual ESR1mut.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Goldner Cesca: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Zodic. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04