Abstract 536P
Background
Brain metastases (BMs) account for more than one-half of all intracranial tumors. In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become the mainstay of BMs treatment, providing high rates of local tumor control. Nevertheless, SRS alone is associated with a 30-50% risk of distant brain failure (DBF), consequently requiring careful follow-up and possible rescue treatments. Silibinin or silybin, a natural polyphenolic flavonoid, has shown promising antitumor activity, leading to improvement of BMs in patients with progressive non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, our exploratory study aims to evaluate whether the use of a silibinin-based nutraceutical (SILLBRAIN, HEALTH4U S.r.l.) can significantly reduce DBF rate at 6 months in patients with first-diagnosed BMs treated with SRS with or without surgery.
Methods
SUSTAIN is an interventional, prospective, single-arm, phase II study. A total of 80 patients treated in our institution are planned to be enrolled. Patients receive 2 capsules of SILLBRAIN per day for the first month after SRS and 1 capsule per day thereafter. Primary endpoints are 6-month distant brain failure (DBF) rate and safety.
Results
Thirty patients have been enrolled at the time of the primary analysis. NSCLC and breast cancer were the prevalent histologies. Overall, the number of treated lesions was 73, with a median of 1 lesion (range 1-9). All patients underwent SRS, with a median prescription dose and a median prescription isodose line of 24 Gy and 80%, respectively. After a 14-month enrollment period, with a median follow-up of 9 months, 6 patients reported DBF according to RANO-BM criteria, with a 6-month DBF rate of 20%. Only 1 treated lesion met the criteria for progression, accounting for a 6-month local control (LC) rate of 98%. Six patients died, with a 6-month OS rate of 80%. Two patients discontinued SILLBRAIN assumption due to G1 nausea. No other adverse events were reported.
Conclusions
At about half of our enrollment target, the results show a favorable trend towards 6-month DBF rate reduction. Toxicity proved manageable, consistent with the literature and limited to gastrointestinal effects. A larger sample and longer follow-up are needed to confirm our hypothesis.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10