Abstract 987P
Background
We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in Korean population under real-world practice.
Methods
Patients were prospectively entered at 29 clinical sites through an observational post-marketing study in Korea, funded by Eisai. Patients were treated with lenvatinib according to the approved indication of uHCC. For safety analysis, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were collected. ADR was defined as AEs where the causal relationship with lenvatinib was not 'unlikely'. The efficacy was assessed by investigators as completed response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as CR or PR in the efficacy analysis set. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify which demographic and clinical factors were related to ORR.
Results
658 patients were included in the safety analysis set. The mean daily dose was 7.8mg/day and 10.1mg/day in patients with a body weight of < 60kg and ≥ 60kg. The relative dose intensity related to tolerance was 97% and 84%, respectively. ADRs > grade 3 were reported in 1% (8/658). The most common ADRs > grade 3 were ‘palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome’ (0.3%, 2/658). In the efficacy analysis set, 513 patients were included. The results were as follows: CR, 1% (5/513); PR, 13% (66/513); SD, 45% (231/513); and PD, 41% (211/513). Among the demographic and clinical factors, ORR was significantly different depending on the total treatment duration (p <0.001).
Table: 987P
Objective response rate n (%) | No. of Subjects n (%) | p-value | |
Total treatment duration | |||
< 3 months | 12 (6) | 191 (38) | <0.001 |
3 months ∼ < 6 months | 21 (13) | 165 (32) | |
6 months ∼ < 9 months | 15 (19) | 78 (15) | |
9 months or above | 23 (30) | 76 (15) | |
Total | 71 (14) | 510 (100) |
Conclusions
Lenvatinib in Korean patients with uHCC was generally well tolerated. The efficacy of treatment varied significantly with regards to the total treatment duration. Patients with longer treatment duration showed higher ORR.
Clinical trial identification
E7080-M082-509
Editorial acknowledgement
We acknowledge the significant contribution of Prof. Kang in reviewing abstract.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Korea and the authors.
Funding
Eisai.
Disclosure
J.J. Kim: Other, Institutional, Project Lead: Eisai Korea. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
956P - Phase II study of adjuvant tislelizumab combined with interferon-α and active surveillance in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion
Presenter: Yixiu Wang
Session: Poster session 18
957P - Interim report of Notable-HCC: A phase Ib study of neoadjuvant PD-1 with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Mingming Li
Session: Poster session 18
959P - Combination therapy of envafolimab and suvemcitug in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Results from a phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Lixia Ma
Session: Poster session 18
960P - Personalized circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring for recurrence detection and treatment response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Maen Abdelrahim
Session: Poster session 18
961P - Blood circulating Galectin-3 is a prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Shadi Chamseddine
Session: Poster session 18
962P - SBRT improves the efficacy of immuno-checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma through the activation of IL-6/JAK1-STAT3/PD-L1 axis mediated by MBD3 degradation
Presenter: Weiwei Yan
Session: Poster session 18
963P - Discovery and validation of cfDNA methylation, AFP and ctDNA mutation for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter prospective study (ASCEND-Hep)
Presenter: Mingxin Pan
Session: Poster session 18
966P - Potential role of neuropilin-1 in the prognosis, development and risk of invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma patients
Presenter: Tania Payo-Serafín
Session: Poster session 18