Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 07

2176P - Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related adverse events: A systematic review

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 07

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Jin Young Kim

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1080-S1134. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01268-1

Authors

J.Y. Kim1, C. Shin2, S. Lee2, S. Shin2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hemato-oncology Department, Keimyung University, 42601 - Daegu/KR
  • 2 Obstetrics And Gynecology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, 42601 - Daegu/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2176P

Background

Immune check point inhibitors (ICI)-based therapies have been remarkably advancing and dramatically changing the treatment modalities of cancer. This review aimed to comprehensively examine and rechallenge immune-related adverse events (irAE) across the literature.

Methods

We searched for clinical studies regarding the use of ICI published in English up to December 2021 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and journal of clinical oncology (JCO). The search strategy was composed of the following terms: [(rechallenge) AND (immune OR immunotherapy OR "immune checkpoint inhibitor")] AND ("side effect” OR "adverse event” OR irAE). Data were extracted by three independent investigators and the disagreements amongst investigators were resolved by consensus.

Results

The average duration of administration of ICI before the occurrence of irAE was 5.8 months (range 0.5 – 9). Discontinuation rate of ICI was 4-36.4% after the occurrence of irAE. IrAE leading to discontinuation varied depending on the type of ICI. However, the most common side effect was colitis with diarrhea regardless of the type of ICI. After ICI rechallenge, second irAE was administered to 40.3-78% of patient, and 48% of patients presented the same type of irAE as the first irAE.

Conclusions

ICI rechallenge appears to be safe given the balance between the advantages of rechallenge and the risk of irAE recurrence maintained by close monitoring.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.