Abstract 393P
Background
SG is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved in multiple countries for patients (pts) with mTNBC after ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies (≥ 1 for metastatic disease). In the ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts with mTNBC, SG had superior efficacy vs single-agent chemotherapy and a manageable safety profile (Bardia et al. NEJM 2021 ). This study describes RW SG dosing and clinical outcomes in pts with mTNBC treated with SG in 2L and later in the US.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study used de-identified US electronic health records in the ConcertAI database of pts (≥ 18 y) with mTNBC treated with SG in 2L and later from April 2020 to May 2022 to allow for a 3-month minimum data accrual. Clinical outcomes (RW overall survival [rwOS], time to next treatment or death [TTNTD], and RW progression-free survival [rwPFS]) from start of SG (index date) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
230 female pts (median age 60 y, 26% Black, 17% ECOG performance status ≥ 2, 66% treated in community settings) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 7.2 months (IQR 3.9-11.1). SG RW outcomes for all pts and by SG line (2L and 3L+) are in the Table. Clinical outcomes were similar for all pts and stratified analyses (by race, concomitant G-CSF use, treatment-free interval duration). Of 134 pts (58%) who had G-CSF during SG treatment, 99 (74%) previously received G-CSF. Median time from SG start to G-CSF use was 8.5 days (IQR 8-29). SG was discontinued due to toxicity in 17 pts (7%). Table: 393P
2L mTNBCSG n = 77 | 3L mTNBCSG n = 153 | 2L+ mTNBCSGN = 230 | |
Median rwOS (95% CI), months*† | 13.9 (9.8-NE) | 8.4 (7.4-10.3) | 10.0 (8.3-11.1) |
rwOS rate (95% CI), % | |||
12-month | 51 (37-64) | 35 (26-44) | 40 (33-48) |
24-month | 32 (13-54) | 20 (11-29) | 23 (15-32) |
Median TTNTD (95% CI), months† | 4.8 (3.2-6.9) | 4.4 (3.8-5.5) | 4.6 (3.9-5.3) |
Median rwPFS (95% CI), months† | 4.9 (2.9-6.0) | 3.5 (2.7-4.2) | 3.8 (3.1-4.3) |
IQR, interquartile range; NE, not estimable. *Kalinsky et al. ASCO 2023 abstr e18879. †Measured from index date.
Conclusions
This RW analysis included patients with mTNBC treated with SG in 2L and later line settings since approval of SG in the US. SG showed survival benefit in this broad patient population. Follow-up duration was short for some pts in this analysis. As data will continue to mature over time, they will provide more insight into RW effectiveness of SG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial support was provided by Yvonne E Yarker, PhD, ISMPP CMPP, of Parexel and funded by Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Funding
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Disclosure
K. Kalinsky: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Immunomedics, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Cyclacel, Oncosec, 4D Pharma, Puma; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Employment + Stock = spouse: Grail; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI, Consultant: Novartis, Eli-Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI, consultant: Genentech; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, consultant: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Seattle Genetics, Ascentantage; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Myovant, Takeda, Menarini; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Menarini; Other, Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Eli-Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer; Other, Steering Committee: Immunomedics, AstraZeneca, Ambryx, Genentech. L. Spring: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Puma, G1 therapeutics, Daiichi Pharma, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Phillips, Merck, Genentech, Gilead, Eli Lilly . C. Yam: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, reimbursement for travel: Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Gilead, Amgen, Merck, Pfizer, Astellas, Genentech, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: GSK; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member: Gilead. I. Ntalla, B. Stwalley, C. Lai: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Gilead Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gilead Sciences. N. Sjekloca: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gilead. A. Kaushiva: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: ConcertAI. A.J. Taylor: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, I work full time for Gilead.: Gilead Sciences Europe Lts; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, I own shares in Gilead.: Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd. R. Nanda: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca , BeyondSpring, Daiichi Sankyo , Fujifilm, GE, Gilead, Infinity , iTeos, Macrogenics, Merck, Novartis, OBI, Oncosed, Pfizer, Sanofi, Seagen, Stemline; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Corcept Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Gilead/Immunomedics, Merck, Novartis, OBI Pharma, Pfizer, Relay, Seattle Genetics, Sun Pharma, Taiho.
Resources from the same session
413P - Characteristics of patients (pts) with previously treated, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ER+, HER2– aBC) who had rapid progression (RP) in acelERA BC
Presenter: Miguel Martin Jimenez
Session: Poster session 03
414P - Trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Isabella Michelon
Session: Poster session 03
415P - Patterns of time-to-progression intervals across clinical and liquid biopsy (LB) features in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) treated with first-line endocrine therapy (ET)
Presenter: Linda Cucciniello
Session: Poster session 03
416P - Cost-effectiveness of first-line (1L) ribociclib use vs palbociclib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC): Analysis based on final overall survival (OS) results of MONALEESA-2 (ML-2) and PALOMA-2 (PAL-2)
Presenter: Sandeep Sehdev
Session: Poster session 03
417P - New insights into second-line (2L) choices after CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts): Preliminary results of the HERMIONE-13 study
Presenter: Viola Cogliati
Session: Poster session 03
418P - Two-year follow-up data on the efficacy and safety of KN026, a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody combined with docetaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-positive recurrent/metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Qingyuan Zhang
Session: Poster session 03
419P - Aspire to ASCENT: Real-world outcomes from patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) treated with Sacituzumab govitecan (Saci) in a single academic institution
Presenter: Elaine Walsh
Session: Poster session 03
421P - Changes in cell-free DNA after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment for advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Takayuki Iwamoto
Session: Poster session 03
422P - UK real-world data (RWD) of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) use in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
Presenter: Georgina Gullick
Session: Poster session 03
423P - A real-world study on the clinical value of apatinib-based regimens in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Huang wei
Session: Poster session 03