Abstract 335P
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of newly diagnosed breast cancer is used to improve resectability, reduce the extent of breast and axillary surgery and improve overall survival. Accurate assessment of locoregional response to NAC is important for surgical planning. Radiological method of choice is post-treatment breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which determines the rate of response according to RECIST criteria. The primary indicator of outcome of NAC is pathologic complete response (pCR). This study aimed to compare radiologic and pathologic complete response rates after neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.
Methods
A retrospective study of 259 breast cancer cases who received NAC between 01.01.2020 and 31.12.2021 at University Hospital Centre Zagreb was conducted with prior Ethics Committee approval. Radiological and pathohistological characteristics of the tumor at the time of diagnosis and after neoadjuvant treatment were analyzed using the Hospital information system (BIS). Furthermore, post-neoadjuvant therapy MRI findings were correlated with the postoperative pathohistological findings. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of radiologic complete response (rCR) as a predictor of pCR were calculated.
Results
Complete data was available for 94.98% (246/259) of patients. In 62 (25.20%) patients, rCR was recorded, radiologic partial response (rPR) in 150 (60.98%), stable disease in 22 (8.94%), and progressive disease in 9 patients. In 78 (31.71%) patients pCR was achieved, 46 (58.97%) were also classified as rCR, while 32 (41.03%) of those showed a radiological stable disease or rPR. Out of the 62 patients with rCR, 16 (25.81%) did not achieve pCR. The sensitivity and specificity of rCR were 90.48% and 58.97%, respectively, while positive predictive value was 82.61%. The overall accuracy of breast MRI in predicting pCR was 80.49%.
Conclusions
Although the sensitivity of breast MRI in predicting pCR was high, the specificity was low with only moderate overall accuracy. Low specificity can lead to an incorrect choice of breast surgery, therefore a better method of evaluation is necessary.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Krizic, N. Dedic Plavetic, T. Silovski: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
303P - Differential prognostic role of PDGFRA alterations in breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Panagiotis Vlachostergios
Session: Poster session 02
304P - Generalizability of 313-SNP PRS for breast cancer risk in non-European ancestries
Presenter: Helen Shang
Session: Poster session 02
305P - Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer
Presenter: Sora Kang
Session: Poster session 02
307P - Identifying new biological subgroups of triple-negative breast cancer using next-generation integrative clustering pipeline
Presenter: Xixuan Zhu
Session: Poster session 02
308P - Regression-based deep-learning predicts breast cancer recurrence risk score from pathology slides
Presenter: Omar El Nahhas
Session: Poster session 02
310P - Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA in early breast cancer using a plasma-only methylation-based assay
Presenter: Mitchell Elliott
Session: Poster session 02
311P - Multinational survey study assessing genetic testing and counselling among patients (pts) with breast cancer (MAGENTA): Results on the genetic counselling experience
Presenter: Ranjit Kaur
Session: Poster session 02
312P - Prediction model of breast cancer patient’s neoadjuvant treatment outcome using breast cancer organoids cultured from core needle biopsies
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 02