Abstract 1340P
Background
The phase 3 FLAURA trial compared osimertinib with either erlotinib or gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and showed longer PFS, OS and a similar safety profile. However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment still need to be investigated in a real-world setting.
Methods
1556 patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received osimertinib or a first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first-line treatment were identified from the CAPTRA-Lung database. 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for clinical bias. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with progression and survival.
Results
202 patients receiving osimertinib and 404 patients receiving first-line EGFR TKIs were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) was 63.4% vs. 48.0% (P<0.001) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 95.5% vs. 96.8% (P=0.443) in the osimertinib arm and the comparator arm separately. Median progression-free survival was 19.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.3 to 24.4) in the osimertinib arm and 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.3 to 12.5) in the comparator arm (hazard ratio for progression, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.59; P < 0.001). Median overall survival was 40.5 months (95% CI, 27.1 to 54.0) versus 34.3 months (95% CI, 30.6 to 38.0) in the osimertinib and comparator groups, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.00; P = 0.045). Most adverse events were mild and there were no treatment-related deaths. Patients treated with osimertinib showed a similar safety profile to the comparator EGFR TKIs.
Conclusions
In the real-world setting, osimertinib also demonstrated longer PFS, OS and a similar safety profile to comparator EGFR TKIs when given as first-line treatment to NSCLC patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1057P - Long-term follow-up of a phase II study of tislelizumab (TIS) monotherapy in patients (pts) with previously treated, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) solid tumors
Presenter: Jian Li
Session: Poster session 19
1058P - Intraperitoneal nivolumab for malignant ascites in patients with advanced gastrointestinal or pancreaticobiliary tract cancer
Presenter: Hsiu-Tzu Wang
Session: Poster session 19
1059P - Tertiary lymphoid structures localization and maturation heterogeneities correlate with divergent clinical outcomes and immune responses of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster session 19
1061P - Association of transcriptomic mapping of tumors with high expression of Tregs to identify surfaceome gene signatures with efficacy to check point inhibitors
Presenter: María Del Mar Noblejas Lopez
Session: Poster session 19
1062P - Anti-PD1 efficacy in European patients with advanced MSI-H/MMRd non-colorectal cancers
Presenter: Christophe Tournigand
Session: Poster session 19
1063P - Differential tumor responses are a poor prognostic factor in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Caterina Tozzi
Session: Poster session 19
1065P - Prospective assessment of nutritional status in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Federica Pecci
Session: Poster session 19
1066P - Negative impact of steroids on the efficacy of immunotherapy in a multi-tumor cohort of patients: time and dose-dependent
Presenter: Víctor Albarrán
Session: Poster session 19
1067P - The interchangeability of Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Lonneke Timmers
Session: Poster session 19