Abstract 576P
Background
Tumor immune contexture plays a crucial role in the outcome of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the modified diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore (mISb) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
Methods
We included 181 LARC patients from a single sub-center of a prospective study (NCT02533271), with 151 (83.4%) receiving surgical treatment and 30 (16.6%) following a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy. Tumor biopsy tissues were stained using dual immunohistochemistry for CD8+ and CD3+ T cell densities, and the CD8/CD3 ratio was calculated. mISb was developed using mean percentile values of CD8+ T cell density and CD8/CD3 ratio, and patients were classified into low (0%-25%), intermediate (>25%-70%), and high (>70%-100%) mISb groups. Spearman correlation analysis was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the prognostic value of mISb for disease-free survival (DFS), and the role of mISb in the W&W strategy was further investigated.
Results
A strong correlation was found between CD8+ and CD3+ T cell densities (R=0.86, P<0.001), and a weaker correlation with the CD8/CD3 ratio (R=0.45). In the low, intermediate, and high mISb groups, there were 35 (23.2%), 84 (55.6%), and 32 (21.2%) patients, respectively. The respective 3-year DFS rates for these groups were 59.0%, 69.5%, and 80.1% (P=0.01). Multivariate analysis in surgically treated patients revealed mISb as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (intermediate vs. high: HR=2.38, 95% CI: 0.92-6.16, P=0.08; low vs. high: HR=3.69, 95% CI: 1.35-10.07, P=0.01). Among W&W patients, 6 (37.5%) in the mISb≤50% group experienced local-region or distant metastases, while only 1 (7.1%) in the mISb>50% group had local-region recurrence.
Conclusions
mISb, as a potentially valuable prognostic indicator, demonstrates significant importance in assessing the prognosis of LARC patients. Future research is needed to further investigate the clinical application of mISb in rectal cancer prognosis, particularly in the context of the W&W strategy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10