Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

255P - Prognostic stratification capacity of the CPS+EG scoring system in HER2-low and HER2-zero early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Nicolas Roussot

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S278-S324. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01258-9

Authors

N. Roussot1, G. Constantin2, I. Desmoulins1, C. Kaderbhai1, A. Hennequin1, D. Mayeur1, S.M. Ilie1, L. Arnould3, A. Bertaut2, J. Eymard4, C. Jouannaud4, A.M. Savoye5, G. Yazbek5, D. Allouache6, C. Delcambre6, I. Hrab6, C. Levy6, C. Segura Djezzer6, M. Deblock7, S. Ladoire1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Dijon), 21000 - Dijon/FR
  • 2 Biostatistics, Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Dijon), 21000 - Dijon/FR
  • 3 Pathology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Dijon), 21000 - Dijon/FR
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, 51100 - Reims/FR
  • 5 Medical Oncology, CHU de Reims - Hôpital Robert Debré, 51092 - Reims, Cedex/FR
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, 14076 - Caen/FR
  • 7 Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, 54519 - Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 255P

Background

CPS+EG scoring system properly defined prognosis subgroups of early breast cancer (eBC) patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with a higher CPS+EG associated with worse outcomes. It remains unknown if CPS+EG similarly stratify prognostic in HER2-low and HER2-zero eBC patients after NACT.

Methods

This pluricenter french retrospective study included eBC pts treated with NACT from 2 cohorts, a monocenter local database at CGFL, Dijon and a pluricenter clinical trial PRIMUNEO (NCT01513408). Molecular features were determined on core biopsies. Threshold for HR positivity was ≥10%. HER2-low/zero status was defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 staining. CPS+EG score was calculated for all pts with available data.

Results

608 patients with HER2-negative eBC that have received NACT were included. Median age at diagnosis was 51.0 y-o. Nearly all pts (98.2%) received >3 NACT cycles. In the overall population, 288 pts (47.4%) were HER2-low. More pts were HR+ than TNBC with 367 (60.3%) and 241 pts (39.7%), respectively. The majority of pts harboring HR+ disease were HER2-low (61.0%) contrary to TNBC eBC pts (26.5%). In the HER2-low and HER2-zero population, CPS+EG was able to well categorized pts within prognosis subgroups (log-rank p <0.0001). Table: 255P

CPS+EG HER2-low (n =288) CPS+EG HER2-zero (n =320)
Score 5-year DFS rate (%) (95% CI) 5-year DFS rate (%) (95% CI)
0 100 (100-100) 100 (100-100)
1 92.9 (82.14-97.28) 86.11 (74.1-92.81)
2 71.95 (60.8-80.43) 86.8 (77.89-92.3)
3 69.78 (58.09-78.8) 72.5 (61.18-81.01)
4 48.03 (29.17-64.63) 55.48 (40.12-68.39)
5 38.1 (8.92-68.02) 30.77 (9.5-55.43)

In HR+/HER2-negative pts, CPS+EG still properly separated pts within prognosis subgroups between HER2-low and HER2-zero pts (log-rank p =0.0012 and p <0.0001, respectively). In TNBC population, CPS+EG appears to be less accurate. Within HR+ and TNBC molecular subtypes, there was no difference in 5-year DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero pts harboring a similar CPS+EG score.

Conclusions

In this study, we show that the CPS+EG scoring system retains its interest for the prognostic stratification of pts treated with NACT for HER2-low and HER2-zero eBC. While it seems especially true for HR+ disease, CPS+EG appears to be less effective for TNBC in isolating different outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.