Abstract 1961P
Background
Sarcomas are rare malignant tumors and represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. An accurate diagnosis of histology is important for treatment strategies. We assessed the pathological review of all patients diagnosed with sarcoma at Siriraj Hospital over a 5-year period to identify the number of first diagnoses compared to the central expert review.
Methods
Histological data from patients diagnosed with sarcoma at Siriraj Hospital were collected over a 5-year period. The initial diagnoses were compared with a certified soft tissue and bone tumor pathologist.
Results
Of the 185 selected patients, 107 (57%) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Full concordance between primary diagnosis and second opinion (the first pathologist and expert reached identical conclusions) was observed in 35 (32.7%) cases, partial concordance (identical diagnosis of connective tumor but different grade or histological type) in 12 (11.2%) cases, and complete discordance (benign versus malignant, different histological type, or invalidation of the diagnosis of sarcoma) in 60 (56.1%) cases. The rate of discordance was higher in incomplete initial IHC (p = 0.003), private laboratory, grade 2 and 3, tumor size ≥ 100 mm (p = 0.01) and age >18. The most common 'full concordance' histology is osteosarcoma (100%, 4 of 4). The main discrepancies were related to histological type (n = 60, 56.1%), subtype (n = 8, 7.5%), and grade plus subtype (n = 4, 3.7%). The mean duration from diagnosis to treatment was 96 days. Only the complete initial report appeared different in the subgroup <97 days group 39 (73.6%) and 97 days group 14 (26.4%) (p=0.03).
Conclusions
More than 65% of the first histological diagnoses were modified in the second reading, possibly resulting in different treatment decisions. The second opinion of the expert improves the quality of diagnosis and possibly the treatment of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1949P - Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) combined with trabectedin as a treatment option in uterine sarcomas
Presenter: Laura Strobel
Session: Poster session 15
1950P - A single-arm, phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus anlotinib in locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: Yong Chen
Session: Poster session 15
1951P - Propranolol monotherapy in angiosarcoma: A window-of-opportunity study (PropAngio)
Presenter: Alaa Embaby
Session: Poster session 15
1952P - Efficacy and safety of utidelone in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (HX-SARC02): A prospective, single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: yu jiang
Session: Poster session 15
1953P - Prognostic value of pretreatment inflammatory markers and other clinicopathological factors for early recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: Pia Van Der Laan
Session: Poster session 15
1954P - The risk of second primary gastrointestinal tract GIT malignancy after primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Presenter: Bushra Alshaikh
Session: Poster session 15
1955P - Distinguishing lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors/well differentiated liposarcomas in histology slides using deep learning
Presenter: Marie karanian
Session: Poster session 15
1956P - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma: NASAR prospective study
Presenter: Jeronimo Martinez-Garcia
Session: Poster session 15
1957P - Results from a phase I/II trial of tinostamustine monotherapy in advanced solid tumours (NCT03345485): Safety and efficacy in a subset of patients (pts) with soft tissue sarcoma (STS)
Presenter: Rashmi Chugh
Session: Poster session 15
1958P - Head and neck soft tissue sarcoma: Evaluation of the 8th AJCC as a prognostic tool for patients treated with curative intent in a multidisciplinary cancer center
Presenter: Giulia Zanetta
Session: Poster session 15