Abstract 1947P
Background
The clinical profiles of recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) need to be explored. The recurrence patterns of RLS are controversial and ambiguous.
Methods
A total of 138 patients with recurrent RLS were finally recruited in the study. The analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was performed by Kaplan‒Meier analysis. The nomogram model was built to predict the survival status of patients. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for the selection of independent prognostic factors that were correlated with OS or RFS.
Results
Among patients, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 70.7%, 35.9% and 30.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates of the 55 patients who underwent R0 resection were 76.1%, 50.8% and 34.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that resection method, tumor size, status of pathological differentiation, pathological subtypes and recurrence pattern were independent risk factors for OS or RFS. Patients with distant recurrence (DR) pattern usually had multifocal tumors (90.5% vs. 74.7%, P < 0.05); they were prone to experience changes of pathological differentiation (69.9% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.05) and had a better prognosis than those with local recurrence (LR) pattern. R0 resection and combined organ resection favored the survival of patients with DR pattern in some cases.
Conclusions
Patients with DR pattern have a better prognosis, and they may benefit more from aggressive combined resection than those with LR. Classifying the recurrence patterns of RLS provides guidance for individualized clinical management of recurrent RLS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1830P - CBP-1018, a bi-ligand-drug conjugate treated in patients with advanced solid tumors: A phase I, multi-center, open-label, dose-escalation and dose expansion study
Presenter: Kaiwen Li
Session: Poster session 15
1831P - Dissecting the meaning of obesity in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: Size or metabolism?
Presenter: Lisa Horvath
Session: Poster session 15
1832P - Centralized screening for homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A feasibility study from a multicenter Spanish cohort
Presenter: Javier Freire
Session: Poster session 15
1833P - Concurrent high-dose IV Vitamin C (IVC) and docetaxel for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial
Presenter: Channing Paller
Session: Poster session 15
1834P - Exposure-efficacy analyses of talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the TALAPRO-2 trial
Presenter: Arun Azad
Session: Poster session 15
1835P - A prospective study to determine the prevalence of DNA repair defects in patients (pts) with advanced prostate cancer (PC)
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster session 15
1836P - Blood based biomarkers identify metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with the greatest benefit from continuing enzalutamide (ENZ) beyond progression in combination with docetaxel (Doc): A pre-specified biomarker study of the phase IIIb PRESIDE trial
Presenter: Maria Ruiz Vico
Session: Poster session 15
1837P - Assessing PSA
Presenter: Susan Halabi
Session: Poster session 15
1839P - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) low pass whole genome sequencing (lpWGS) studies identify genomic alterations associating with taxane outcomes in prospective phase III taxane trials for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) sufferers
Presenter: George Seed
Session: Poster session 15