Abstract 2330P
Background
AI may predict driver mutations from H&E slides, and this prediction may be useful as a screening tool to guide the efficient use of molecular testing. Here, we investigate the prediction performance for mutations in six driver oncogenes and explore the benefits to clinical workflow in NSCLC treatment decisions.
Methods
NSCLC samples from Neogenomics (n=2,161) and TCGA (n=933) were used for model development. Four features were used: two convolutional neural networks trained for cell and tissue, a self-supervised vision transformer, and an AI-based pathology profiling analyzer for semantic contents. A set of classifiers was trained and ensembled for improved robustness. Performance of the model was validated in an independent dataset (n=792), then we simulated real-world impact based on the prevalence of driver mutations from AACR GENIE v13.1 NSCLC (n=19,722).
Results
Table 2330P shows the dataset and performance of the models. Given 2.8% prevalence of MET exon skipping mutations (MET-ex), 8.5% positive predictive value (PPV) means that a test-positive patient has a 3x higher chance of being true-MET-ex positive compared to the overall patient population. Moreover, given 99.2% specificity and 49.4% prevalence, PPV for selecting patients without mutations (All-WT) is 95.2%, enabling avoidance of unnecessary tests with potentially acceptable error (<5%). Table: 2330P
Internal set | External set | |||||
n (%) | AUC | n (%) | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
EGFR-mt | 384 (12.4) | 0.841 | 224 (28.3) | 0.723 | 75.5% | 52.6% |
KRAS-mt | 516 (16.7) | 0.728 | 130 (16.4) | 0.721 | 86.2% | 22.5% |
ALK-tr | 310 (10.0) | 0.795 | 46 (5.8) | 0.738 | 39.1% | 81.8% |
ROS1-tr | 295 (9.5) | 0.793 | 62 (7.8) | 0.609 | 14.5% | 70.6% |
RET-tr | 307 (9.9) | 0.763 | 11 (1.4) | 0.683 | 18.2% | 96.4% |
MET-ex | 240 (7.8) | 0.789 | 12 (1.5) | 0.849 | 83.3% | 74.4% |
All-WT | 1045 (33.8) | N/A | 277 (35.0) | N/A | 15.9% | 99.2% |
AUC, area-under-the-curve; ex, exon skipping; mt, mutation; tr, translocation.
Conclusions
A novel clinical workflow, using AI analysis of H&E to predict genomic profiles and identify which patients would benefit from confirmatory molecular testing, could enable better and more efficient treatment decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Lunit.
Disclosure
S. Park: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Lunit. S. Lee: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Roche, Merck, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS/Ono, Takeda, Janssen, IMBdx; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Roche, Merck, Lilly, Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck, AstraZeneca, Lunit. Y. Choi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Lunit. J. Park, S. Shin, T. Lee, H. Song, J. Ro, J. Moon, S. Kim, C. Ahn, S. Pereira, D. Yoo, C. Ock: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Lunit. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2357P - TRX-221, a 4th generation, mutant-selective, and CNS-active EGFR inhibitor with robust antitumor activity in osimertinib-resistant tumor models harboring C797S mutation
Presenter: Sumin Lim
Session: Poster session 16
2358P - Assessing the efficacy of robot-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: Results from a three-year clinical trial
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: Poster session 16