Abstract 1877P
Background
After completion of curative cancer treatment patients enter the re-entry phase, which is characterized by the difficult task to pick up life again. In the re-entry patients face existential concerns, besides physical and psychosocial concerns. Finding meaning and purpose in this new situation may help in dealing with existential concerns. More insight is needed in the existential concerns and the meaning-making process in order to support patients in the re-entry phase.
Methods
We conducted 6 focus groups with 16 patients (5 patients with melanoma and 11 with breast cancer) during the re-entry phase, defined as the point from completion of treatment (after surgical treatment and adjuvant systemic treatment, except for hormonal therapy) up to 18 months in remission. A thematic content analysis was performed by two researchers.
Results
In general, patients experienced existential concerns regarding their worldview, inner posture, values and the future. In addition, patients with melanoma struggled with trust and responsibility for their health; patients with breast cancer struggled with relationships and identity. Outcomes of the meaning-making process identified were: meaning is affected and gives distress, existing sources of meaning are helpful, search for meaning or new meaning has been found. These outcomes were found at the beginning as well as further into the re-entry, however during the re-entry the focus of the meaning-making process shifted from the disease to (picking up) life.
Conclusions
The transition from being a patient to picking up daily life in the re-entry phase involves dealing with existential concerns causing distress. Patients use existing sources of meaning, search for new meaning or have found new meaning in order to deal with these existential concerns and distress. A meaning-centered intervention increasing patients awareness of their personal sources of meaning might strengthen their meaning-making process and can help in dealing with existential concerns.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
A. Visser and L. Post.
Funding
Novartis b.v.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1866P - Unmasking the extent of hidden sexual distress in young breast cancer survivors
Presenter: Zeineb Naimi
Session: Poster session 05
1867P - A cross-sectional examination of information disclosure and health literacy amongst patients with lymphoma
Presenter: Steve Kalloger
Session: Poster session 05
1868P - Challenges for shared decision making in incurable cancer, with a focus on health literacy
Presenter: Chloe Holden
Session: Poster session 05
1871P - The PainRELife ecosystem: A new aid for improving clinical care and shared decision-making in breast cancer patients with chronic pain
Presenter: Marianna Masiero
Session: Poster session 05
1872P - Financial distress of a cancer disease in Germany: A new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and first results from a bi-centered cross-sectional analysis
Presenter: Sophie Pauge
Session: Poster session 05
1873P - Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and self-care behaviours: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster session 05
1874P - Beliefs about chemotherapy in Tunisian patients newly diagnosed with cancer
Presenter: Hadhemi Ayadi
Session: Poster session 05
1875P - Behind the use of ChatGPT for oncological purposes: Fears and challenges
Presenter: Ilaria Durosini
Session: Poster session 05
1876P - Cancer stigma: How Tunisian patients perceive their cancer
Presenter: sofiene Fendri
Session: Poster session 05