Abstract 1709P
Background
Time-to-treatment failure (TTF), in which both disease progression and treatment interruption are regarded as events, is a common measure in clinical trials that can be used as a sensitivity analysis for informative censoring. However, TTF is inappropriate for excessive censoring in the control group as it exaggerates the effect size instead of penalizing the bias. We propose a novel measure, the modified TTF (mTTF), that considers censoring as events only for excessive censoring in the intervention group. Here we examine whether excessive censoring in the intervention could affect the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) leading to FDA-approved drugs using mTFF.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study collecting data from phase II and phase III RCTs of FDA drugs approved based on surrogate endpoints between 2010 and 2020. We reconstructed individual patient data from the published Kaplan-Meier curves of the primary surrogate endpoint. The reverse Kaplan-Meier method (i.e., events and censoring are flipped) was used to quantify excess censoring between study groups. The mTTF sensitivity analysis was conducted and statistical significance was calculated using the log-rank test.
Results
One hundred and one RCTs comprising 60,697 patients were included. The most common surrogate endpoint was progression-free survival with 86 (85.1%) of the studies. The median HR for surrogate endpoints was 0.54 (IQR [interquartile range], 0.41 to 0.63) and the median p-value was 3.0*10-5 (IQR, 2.8*10-8 to 1.5*10-3). Following adjustment for excess censoring using the mTTF the median HR was 0.68 (IQR, 0.52 to 0.84) and the median p-value was 4.2*10-3 (IQR, 2.5*10-6 to 0.12). Across all trials, 35 (34.6%) lost statistical significance using the mTTF.
Conclusions
We introduce mTFF as a practical clinical endpoint that is less conservative than the TTF and is sensitive to excessive censoring in the intervention group. Our findings suggest that some studies are associated with an excessive drop-out rate favouring the intervention group that may lead to a false conclusion regarding the efficacy of FDA-approved treatments. Meaningful shared decision-making requires careful consideration of informative censoring.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
G. Markel: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: 4c Biomed, Purple Biotech, Biond Biologics, Ella therapeutics, Nucleai, Beyond Air, Stareget; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi SA, Novartis International AG, Bristol Myers Squib. T. Meirson: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, I report receiving personal fees from Purple Biotech: Purple Biotech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1890P - Switch-maintenance therapy with nivolumab in TKI-sensitive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Subgroup analysis for PD-L1 status of a randomized phase II study (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Christopher Darr
Session: Poster session 23
1891P - Determinants of exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Renee Saliby
Session: Poster session 23
1892P - A pooled meta-analysis of salvage nivolumab/ipilimumab (N+I) after nivolumab (N) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Rana McKay
Session: Poster session 23
1895P - Time to treatment failure (TTF) and treatment beyond progression (TBP) in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) receiving nivolumab: A survival outcome and a therapeutic strategy of clinical benefit (meet-uro 15)
Presenter: Sara Elena Rebuzzi
Session: Poster session 23
1896P - Clinical management and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I): A real-world study
Presenter: Tom Geldart
Session: Poster session 23
1897P - Geographical differences in the management of metastatic de novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune-combinations
Presenter: Francesco Massari
Session: Poster session 23
1899P - Comparative effectiveness of second-line (2L) treatment (Rx) with cabozantinib (cabo) in patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) after first-line (1L) Rx with ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi+nivo) vs. PD-1/L1 inhibitor (PDI) + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
Presenter: Georges Gebrael
Session: Poster session 23
1900P - Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) in the era of immunotherapy (IO): An analysis of the national cancer database (2004-2020)
Presenter: ALINA BASNET
Session: Poster session 23