Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 21

1471P - Immunotherapy prolongs long-term real-world survival compared to chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 21

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Kun Kim

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S755-S851. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01943-9

Authors

K. Kim1, M. Sweeting2, N. Wilking3, L. Jönsson1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Neurobiology, Care Sciences And Society, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 - Stockholm/SE
  • 2 Statistical Methodology And Data Sciences, AstraZeneca UK, 54FP+V - Cambridge/GB
  • 3 Oncology And Pathology Department, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 - Stockholm/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1471P

Background

Survival benefit of immunotherapy (IO) has been demonstrated in clinical trials for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) but no real-world study was found in literature to measure the long-term treatment effect compared to chemotherapy (CT). This retrospective and observational study aimed to evaluate whether IO has improved the long-term real-world overall survival (rwOS) and real-world time to receive next line of therapy (rwTTNT) in mNSCLC based on Flatiron Health oncology database.

Methods

Electronic health records of patients who received either IO (IO mono or IO+CT) or CT in first line (1L) and second line (2L) treatment from January 1, 2015 and onwards were extracted. Eligible patients were selected to match based on a developed propensity score to balance covariates that may confound the treatment effect. The effect of IO rwOS and rwTTNT was estimated using Cox regression. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess effect modification of known prognostic factors in mNSCLC.

Results

A total of 16,856 1L patients and 6,570 2L patients were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics between IO and CT arms were balanced after 1:1 propensity score matching with replacement. The maximum follow-up was 7.1 years for 1L and 7.3 years for 2L. Among 1L IO patients, median rwOS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 10.5 – 11.2) (vs. 1L CT: 9.0 [95% CI: 8.7 – 9.3]) with hazard ratio (HR) 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80 – 0.89). The HR for rwTTNT was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.51 – 0.57). Among 2L IO patients, median rwOS was 8.9 months (95% CI: 8.6 – 9.4) (vs. 2L CT: 8.3 [95% CI: 7.8 – 9.0]) with HR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84 – 0.98). The HR for rwTTNT was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69 – 0.79). Subgroup analyses among IO patients showed better survival outcomes for patients with younger age, low ECOG score, low comorbidity index, no history of smoking, PD-L1 positivity, and high PD-L1 expression level. The treatment effects increased over time and persisted until the end of the follow-up period.

Conclusions

IO was associated to prolong overall survival and delay receiving next line of therapies in mNSCLC patients. The significant survival benefits were found even after several years of follow-up.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Karolinska Institute.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Disclosure

K. Kim: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca Nordic AB. M. Sweeting: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca UK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.