Abstract 1582P
Background
Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) in young patients presents poor prognosis due to heterogeneity of the disease and lack of dedicated treatment resulting in high socioeconomic impact. Objective was to explore clinical and molecular features.
Methods
Included patients had diagnosis of GEA at an age of ≤50 years evaluated at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital between 2015 and 2023. Clinical data was obtained retrospectively from the electronic medical history. ESMO Scale of Clinical Actionability for molecular Targets (ESCAT) was used to classify biomarkers. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
We identified 170 patients with GEA under 50 years. Clinical characteristics are outlined in the table. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (m) (95% CI 14.7 – 18.1) since diagnosis of advanced disease (n=159). Patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors had better OS compared to esophageal (HR 0.29 (95% CI 0.15-0.58) 20.1 vs 13.3 m p= 0.0003) or gastric (HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.26-0.86) 20.1 vs 15.9 m p=0.01). Survival analysis didn´t show statistically significant differences in OS regarding sex, HER2 status, ascites or signet ring cells. We found ESCAT I, II and III alterations in 52, 5 and 10 cases respectively. Most tier I (38) were HER2 overexpression/amplification, all received matched therapy with trastuzumab. Other were: MSI (10), TMB-H (3) and FRFR2 amp (1). Among Tier II: BCRA1 mut (1), BRCA2 mut (1) and EGFR amplification (3) and Tier III: PIK3CA mut (5), HER2 mut (3) and ATM mut (2). Table: 1582P
N = 170 (100%) | |
Sex | |
Male:Female | 91 (53,5): 79 (46,5) |
Age | Median 42 (18-50) |
Localization | |
Esophageal | 20 (11,8) |
EGJ | 44 (25,9) |
Gastric | 106 (62,4) |
Histology | |
Diffuse | 33 (19,4) |
Intestinal | 17 (10) |
Poorly cohesive | 29 (17,1) |
Undifferentiated | 18 (10,6) |
Others | 73 (43) |
Signet ring cells | |
Yes | 67 (39,4) |
No | 103 (60,6) |
Stage | |
I-III | 53 (31,2) |
IV | 117 (68,8) |
Metastatic site | |
Peritoneal | 85 (50) |
Liver | 35 (20,6) |
Ascites at diagnosis | |
Yes | 38 (22,4) |
No | 118 (69,4) |
Not applicable | 14 (8,2) |
NGS | |
Yes | 82 (48,2) |
No | 88 (51,8) |
Conclusions
Our results indicate that young patients present poor prognosis features (localization, advanced stage, histology) but a significant number of them presented ESCAT I alterations, being candidates to receive a matched therapy as standard of care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Vivancos: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Guardant Health, Bayer, Incyte; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: REVEAL GENOMICS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Preclinical Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Incyte. T. Macarulla: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ability Pharmaceutical, SL, AstraZeneca, Basilea Pharma, Batxer, BioLineRX Ltd, Celgene SLU, Eisai, IPSEN Pharma, Incyte; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Direct research fund: Servier, Merck, Sharp and Dhome, Novocure, QED Therapeutics Inc, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Zymeworks; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Lilly, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amc Medical Research, Armo Biosciences, Basilea, Biokeralty Research Institute, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Oncomed Pharmaceuticals, QED Therapeutics, VCN Biosciences, AbbVie Farmaceútica, Ability Pharmaceuticals, Agios, Amgen, Aslan, AstraZecena, Bayer, BeiGene, BioLineRX, Blueprint Medicines, Boston Biomedical, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Cantargia, Celgene, Eisai, Erytech Pharma, F. Hoffmann-la Roche, FibroGen, Genentech, Hallozyme, Immunomedics, Incyte, Ipsen, Lab. Menarini, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, MedImmune, Merimarck, Millenim, Nelum, Novartis, Novocure, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Roche, Zymeworks; Non-Financial Interests, Member: American Society of Clinical Oncology - ASCO, “Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica” – SEOM, Sociedad Europea de Oncología Médica - ESMO. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1645P - STAT3, ACTA2, and SPARC stromal markers predict response to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/Nab-paclitaxel (GCN) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (apdac)
Presenter: Himil Mahadevia
Session: Poster session 22
1646P - Genomic and prognostic differences in patients with different KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 22
1647P - Cancer-associated endocrine cell: A novel component of tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yuan Chen
Session: Poster session 22
1648P - Association between circulating tumor cell count and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monica Benavente
Session: Poster session 22
1649P - Comprehensive genomic profiling contributes to the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Eiichiro So
Session: Poster session 22
1650P - Identification of potential targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The KRAS Wild-Type subset
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1651P - Comparison of surgical outcome and prognostic factors between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal types of periampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Presenter: Saad Anwar
Session: Poster session 22
1652P - Interaction between enhanced cytokine signalling and ferroptosis defence fuels obesity-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma oncogenesis
Presenter: Rishat Ruzi
Session: Poster session 22
1653P - The activated thermogenesis of intra-pancreatic fat fuels the progression of pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xi'n'peng Yin
Session: Poster session 22
1654P - Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer: Updated of a prospective study
Presenter: Natalia Gutierrez Alonso
Session: Poster session 22