Abstract 1720P
Background
On February 6, 2023, an earthquake occurred in Turkey that affected 11 provinces, many hospitals and millions of people. In Hatay, one of the provinces most affected by the earthquake, all 4 oncology centers in were partially or completely destroyed. So, a new unit was established in Dörtyol District Hospital, one of the few standing hospitals. On February 27, 2023, the first oncologist was assigned to the new oncology unit in Dörtyol Hospital. On 01 March 2023, the oncology outpatient clinic started to work and with the arrival of drugs, the first intravenous systemic anticancer treatment was administered on 03 March 2023. The aim of this abstract is to share our experience on how oncology services continue in the event of a major disaster.
Methods
In this abstract, the attempts made to provide oncology services after the earthquake in Hatay and the results of the first 100 patients followed in the new facility are summarized. The patients followed at the oncology outpatient clinic had their age, gender, primary diagnosis, and causes for admission retrospectively analysed.
Results
Between 01 and 10 March 2023, 100 patients applied to the oncology unit. A total of 62 of the patients were women. The median age of the group was 54. The most common diagnosis was breast cancer (N=46), followed by GIS (N=17) and lung (N=14) malignancies. The numbers of local, locoregional and metastatic diseases were 20, 33 and 47, respectively. Most common admission purpose was routine follow up (N=38), followed by scheduled systemic therapy (N=34). A total of 38 patients received systemic therapy while 9 had hormonotherapy and 3 had palliative treatment. Respectively, 5 patients were referred to different cities for PET scan, 3 patients for radiotherapy, and 7 patients due to the absence of drugs in the hospital.
Conclusions
Oncology is not a suitable field to delay or cancel active or palliative treatments. For this reason, it is inevitable to continue oncological services under all conditions, as has been seen in the recent COVID pandemic. On the other hand, due to the treatments applied, oncology centers have to meet some basic requirements in terms of infrastructure and work force. As in the Hatay experience, it is vital to take quick actions and ensure coordination after a disaster.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1902P - Comparison of cabozantinib (CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) following first-line (1L) nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A target trial emulation using real-world data from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Audreylie Lemelin
Session: Poster session 23
1903P - Tumor response by baseline metastases in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) vs sunitinib (S): Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial
Presenter: Viktor Gruenwald
Session: Poster session 23
1904P - Treatment options and outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain or bone metastases: A real-world evidence from a German retrospective multi-center analysis
Presenter: Pia Paffenholz
Session: Poster session 23
1905P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts the distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster session 23
1906P - Metastasized non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Which entities are dangerous? Results learned from reference pathology of the SuniForecast study
Presenter: Arndt Hartmann
Session: Poster session 23
1907P - Multi-omics mapping positions antigenic myeloid-T cell crosstalk at the core of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Lisa Kinget
Session: Poster session 23
1908P - Utility of circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment response monitoring in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Michael Smigelski
Session: Poster session 23
1909P - Baseline cytokine levels according to the line of treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study
Presenter: Larissa Rainho
Session: Poster session 23
1910P - Evaluation of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform for circulating tumor DNA quantification and prognostic performance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Brian Rini
Session: Poster session 23
1911P - Effect of VHL mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Guojie Yu
Session: Poster session 23