Abstract 318P
Background
The semi-dry dot-blot (SDB) method, a diagnostic procedure for detecting lymph node (LN) metastases using anti-cytokeratin (CK) antibody, is based on the theory that epithelial components such as CK are not found in normal LNs. Thus, metastases are diagnosed on basis of the presence of CK in lavage fluid of sectioned LNs. We prospectively evaluated novel SDB kits that use a newly developed anti-CK19 antibody and an automatic reader for diagnosing sentinel LN metastases in patients with breast cancer as a multi-center study.
Methods
We obtained 924 sentinel LNs dissected between January 2021 and December 2021 at six institutes in Japan. We excluded patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These LNs were sliced at 2-mm intervals and washed with PBS. Cells suspended in the lavage fluid of sliced LNs were centrifuged and lysed to extract protein. The extracted protein was applied to the SDB kit to diagnose LN metastasis using an automatic reader that evaluates absorbance. Washed LNs were blindly examined using intraoperative and permanent histological examination. Diagnoses based on SDB kit were compared with diagnoses made by permanent histological examination of the LNs. Primary endpoints were sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement of the SDB kit for distinguishing macrometastases from non-macrometastases.
Results
Ninety-four of the 924 LNs were assessed as macrometastases, 40 as micrometastases and 790 as negative by histological examination. With a borderline CK19 absorbance of 11.9 milli-absorbance for detecting macrometastases with 0.989 Area Under the Curve, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement of the SDB kit were 94.7%, 98.3%, and 97.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the kits and the automatic reader yielded diagnoses in approximately 20 min at a cost of less than 30 EUR for the SDB kit and less than 3,000 EUR for the automatic reader.
Conclusions
The kits with an automatic reader used in our study were accurate, quick, and cost-effective in diagnosing LN metastases without loss of LN tissue, and were especially useful for detecting distinguish macrometastases.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
303P - Differential prognostic role of PDGFRA alterations in breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Panagiotis Vlachostergios
Session: Poster session 02
304P - Generalizability of 313-SNP PRS for breast cancer risk in non-European ancestries
Presenter: Helen Shang
Session: Poster session 02
305P - Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer
Presenter: Sora Kang
Session: Poster session 02
307P - Identifying new biological subgroups of triple-negative breast cancer using next-generation integrative clustering pipeline
Presenter: Xixuan Zhu
Session: Poster session 02
308P - Regression-based deep-learning predicts breast cancer recurrence risk score from pathology slides
Presenter: Omar El Nahhas
Session: Poster session 02
310P - Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA in early breast cancer using a plasma-only methylation-based assay
Presenter: Mitchell Elliott
Session: Poster session 02
311P - Multinational survey study assessing genetic testing and counselling among patients (pts) with breast cancer (MAGENTA): Results on the genetic counselling experience
Presenter: Ranjit Kaur
Session: Poster session 02
312P - Prediction model of breast cancer patient’s neoadjuvant treatment outcome using breast cancer organoids cultured from core needle biopsies
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 02