Abstract 1568P
Background
To increase the effectiveness of the treatment, radiotherapy (RT) is frequently combined with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiosensitizer medications. Identifying a patient’s radiosensitivity can be important for determining patient’s therapy strategy. But there isn’t a reliable and pertinent radiation sensitivity prediction model for assessing radiation sensitivity. Here, we propose the cancer organoid-based platform for predicting the individual RT response evaluation and recurrence.
Methods
Eighteen Esophageal cancer biopsy tissues were dissociated to single cells and then disposed with BME on pillar plate (MBD co., Korea) to make the cancer organoids. After forming the organoids, these were exposed to radiation doses of 2, 4 and 8Gy. We are staining live organoid with calcein AM after radiation and obtain organoid viability. From viability, AUC (area under curve) and growth rate were calculated to predict patient’s radiation sensitivity. With these two variables, the patient's cancer stage score was also used to predict patient’s radiation sensitivity. CODRP (cancer organoid-based diagnosis reactivity prediction), radiosensitivity predication index, were calculated by patient’s AUC, growth rate, and cancer stage.
Results
Radiation sensitivity prediction model using each single-factor (patient’s AUC, growth rate and cancer stage) showed about 62% specificity, 72% sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) was 69%. However, when applying multi-factor model (CODRP), the specificity was 81.8%, the sensitivity was 85.7%, and the PPV was 90%. In the CODRP model, the radiation sensitive group showed 11.1% recurrence rate, while the radiation resistive group showed 72.7% recurrence rate. Therefore, there was a significant difference in recurrence-free survival rate between the sensitive group and the non-responder group based on the CODRP model.
Conclusions
Our proposed CODRP models using patient derived cancer organoid successfully predict clinical response of patient’s radiation treatment. Thus, this platform has promise as a novel prognostic indicator for people with esophageal cancer and can support precision treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1532P - Phase Ib study of futibatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with esophageal carcinoma: Updated results of antitumor activity and tolerability results in combination with chemotherapy
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 21
1535P - Paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus paclitaxel alone in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, refractory or intolerant to combination therapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs: Final results from the randomized phase II IKF-S627/RAMOS trial of the AIO
Presenter: Magdalena Scheck
Session: Poster session 21
1536P - HERIZON: A phase II study of HER-Vaxx (IMU-131), a HER2-targeting peptide vaccine plus standard of care chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ advanced stomach cancer - Dose-dependent anti-cancer antibodies correlating with improved clinical outcome
Presenter: Joshua Tobias
Session: Poster session 21
1537P - A phase I study of pevonedistat plus capeOX in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to platinum (NCCH-1811)
Presenter: Daisuke Takahari
Session: Poster session 21
1540P - Tislelizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective, phase II clinical study
Presenter: Yi Zhang
Session: Poster session 21
1541P - Neoadjuvant therapy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC)
Presenter: Yinjun Dong
Session: Poster session 21