Abstract 1859P
Background
Cognitive impairment (CI) is a common late effect after cancer treatment, for which effective treatment is lacking. Goal Management Training (GMT) is a validated cognitive remediation protocol reported to improve cognition including perceived daily life executive functioning, in neurological conditions. However, GMT has never been examined in cancer survivors, nor been presented in a digital format. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of digital GMT in cervical cancer survivors (CCS) with subjective and/or objective CI.
Methods
We invited 65 CCS with CI to participate. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between digital GMT and a computerized cognitive training (CCT) program (BrainHQ). GMT consists of six weekly group-based modules encompassing discussion of participants’ real-life cognitive deficits, practice on tasks of attention and self-monitoring, as well as homework assignments. BrainHQ is a web-based training platform with exercises targeting several cognitive domains. For six weeks, participants joined digital training sessions of one hour twice a week. The primary endpoint was attendance, and participants attending ≥80% of the sessions were categorized as completers. Acceptability was evaluated 1 week post-intervention using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). A total CSQ-8 score ≥ 26 was defined as “very satisfied”, scores 20-25 as “satisfied”, and scores <20 as “not satisfied”.
Results
33 CCS with a median age of 50.0 years (range 35-67) were randomized to either GMT (N = 16) or CCT (N = 17). In the GMT group, all participants completed the intervention (100%), compared to 15 (88%) in the CCT group. Median CSQ-8 in the GMT and CCT group was 25 (SD 3.7, range 18-31) and 24 (SD 3.1, range 19-30) respectively. Participants in both groups reported a high level of satisfaction as 40% reported being “very satisfied” and 53% “satisfied”.
Conclusions
A digital cognitive training program such as GMT is feasible with a high level of compliance and satisfaction in CCS and is suitable to be tested in a larger study. Exploratory analyses of neuropsychological assessments in our study will provide important preliminary data on the efficacy of improving cognitive function in CCS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Jan Kåre Heiberg and Marthe Vildåsen.
Disclosure
K. lindemann: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Grants or contracts, paid to institution: GSK; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Participation on Data Safety Monitoring/advisory board: Eisai, MSD, Nycode, AstraZeneca, GSK. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1867P - A cross-sectional examination of information disclosure and health literacy amongst patients with lymphoma
Presenter: Steve Kalloger
Session: Poster session 05
1868P - Challenges for shared decision making in incurable cancer, with a focus on health literacy
Presenter: Chloe Holden
Session: Poster session 05
1871P - The PainRELife ecosystem: A new aid for improving clinical care and shared decision-making in breast cancer patients with chronic pain
Presenter: Marianna Masiero
Session: Poster session 05
1872P - Financial distress of a cancer disease in Germany: A new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and first results from a bi-centered cross-sectional analysis
Presenter: Sophie Pauge
Session: Poster session 05
1873P - Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and self-care behaviours: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster session 05
1874P - Beliefs about chemotherapy in Tunisian patients newly diagnosed with cancer
Presenter: Hadhemi Ayadi
Session: Poster session 05
1875P - Behind the use of ChatGPT for oncological purposes: Fears and challenges
Presenter: Ilaria Durosini
Session: Poster session 05
1876P - Cancer stigma: How Tunisian patients perceive their cancer
Presenter: sofiene Fendri
Session: Poster session 05
1877P - Meaning-making in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients with breast cancer and melanoma
Presenter: Anna Visser
Session: Poster session 05