Abstract 2206P
Background
Pre-clinical studies indicate that the KRAS pathway enhances the stability and expression of PD-L1. We investigated the expression of the circulating mRNA (cmRNA) levels of KRAS4A and KRAS4B isoforms and their possible impact on progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with Pembrolizumab (P) by liquid biopsy.
Methods
Patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma without driver mutations undergoing P or P plus chemotherapy (PC) were prospectively accrued to analyze KRAS4A, KRAS4B and PD-L1 cmRNA levels by liquid biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) calculated the Youden index to define the optimum cut-off values for binary classification of patients and PFS analysis. Both the KRAS isoforms were also studied for association with the PD-L1 cmRNA levels. RT-PCR is the method used for expression analysis.
Results
In 56 fully assessable patients, 28 received P and 28 patients PC. Patients with high (H) KRAS4A cmRNA and HKRAS4B cmRNA levels showed significantly better PFS than patients classified with low (L). The median PFS of patients with H KRAS4A cmRNA and H KRAS4B cmRNA levels was 29 months (95% CI 22-29 months) and 24 months (95% CI 13-29 months), respectively. The median PFS of patients with L KRAS4A cmRNA and L KRAS4B cmRNA expression was 12 months (95% CI 6-15 months) and 12 months (95% CI 5-20 months), respectively. H KRAS4A cmRNA retained a significant positive association with PFS in the multivariate model. The mean expression values of PD-L1 cmRNA levels were significantly higher in patients with H KRAS4A cmRNA and H KRAS4B cmRNA levels. Moreover, an exploratory analysis in treatment subgroups found a positive association between H KRAS4A cmRNA and H KRAS4B cmRNA levels with PFS in patients treated with P.
Conclusions
Our results suggest the KRAS4A isoform deserves further investigation as a potential marker for defining patients who may benefit the most from immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Progresses in this field are desirable to improve personalized cancer immunotherapeutic strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
FanoAteneo (non-profit association), Italy.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2161P - Organization of hospital pharmaceutical consultations for cancer patients receiving oral anticancer drugs: A nationwide cross-sectional study
Presenter: Florian Slimano
Session: Poster session 07
2162P - Can artificial intelligence provide accurate and reliable answers to cancer patients' questions? Comparison of chatbots based on the ESMO Patient Guide about cancer pain
Presenter: Kadriye Bir Yucel
Session: Poster session 07
2163P - Supportive care in French community pharmacies: OncoPharma certification
Presenter: Jérôme Sicard
Session: Poster session 07
2164P - The impact of cancer patients’ face masks on oxygenation and Co2 retention during treatment
Presenter: Mert Sahin
Session: Poster session 07
2165P - A French overview of electronic patient-reported outcomes use in 2022
Presenter: Melina Hocine
Session: Poster session 07
2166P - Long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients
Presenter: Yana Debie
Session: Poster session 07
2167P - Are bone targeted agents (BTAs) still useful in times of immunotherapy? The SAKK 80/19 BTA study
Presenter: Michael Mark
Session: Poster session 07
2168P - At-home infusion of immunotherapy for patients with solid tumors: First results from a single-centre program
Presenter: Javier Marco Hernández
Session: Poster session 07
2169P - Immunotherapy-based treatment in elderly cancer patients: A real-world multicenter study
Presenter: Mengye He
Session: Poster session 07
2171P - Incidence of adverse events in patients treated with a combination of immune checkpoint blockers and chemotherapy: A real life cohort
Presenter: Layal Rached
Session: Poster session 07