Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EONS16: Supportive care

CN36 - Current care for patients on oral anticancer therapy through a different lens: Assessment from a patient and healthcare professional perspective

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

EONS16: Supportive care

Presenters

Lise-Marie Kinnaer

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1229-S1256. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1321

Authors

A. Van Hecke1, L. Kinnaer2, V. Foulon3, I. Kenis4

Author affiliations

  • 1 University Centre For Nursing, Ghent University - University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, 9000 - GENT/BE
  • 2 University Centre For Nursing, Ghent University - University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, 9000 - Ghent/BE
  • 3 Pharmacy, KU Leuven, 3000 - Leuven/BE
  • 4 University Centre For Nursing, Ghent University, 9000 - Gent/BE

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract CN36

Background

Over the last decades, an important shift from a disease-focused to a patient-centered approach has taken place in cancer care. This study examined the quality of patient-centered care for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs (OACD), from the patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective.

Methods

Patients and HCPs from 12 Flemish oncology departments completed the CONTACT-Patient-Centered Care Questionnaire (CONTACT-PCCQ) and the CONTACT – Key Elements Questionnare (CONTACT-KEQ) respectively. The questionnaires are based on an evidence-based and validated list of key elements (KEs) considered crucial in patient-centered care for patients on OACD. Patients were asked to indicate how they experienced the performance of each KE on a five-point Likert scale. The HCPs were asked to indicate whether the KE was performed or not. The degree of performance, according to patients and HCPs, was calculated for each KE.

Results

In total, 266 patients and 275 HCPs participated. The degree of performance according to patients ranged from 22% to 95%, with 36 KEs having a degree of performance < 70% (i.e., underperformed). According to HCPs, the degree of performance varied between 23% and 99%, and 15 KEs were underperformed. While HCPs mainly assigned low scores to items related to coordination of care, patients scored low on items regarding counselling at treatment-initiation and during follow-up, and psychosocial support.

Conclusions

This study uncovered gaps in patient-centered care according to patients and HCPs. The differences between the scores of patients and HCPs highlight the importance of including both perspectives when evaluating patient-centeredness of care practices.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Kom op tegen Kanker.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.