Abstract 300P
Background
PD-L1 expression is determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses. PD-L1 positivity can differ depending on the used antibody. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of IHC and mRNA PD-L1 expression and their associations to prognosis.
Methods
For this analysis, 85 TNBC samples from a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients (n=1,270, PiA Prognostic Assessment in routine application, NCT 01592825) were eligible. IHC was performed using CAL10 antibody (BioCare), ≥1% staining was considered PD-L1 positive for immune cell score (IC), tumour proportion score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS). For analysis of mRNA expression, microarray analysis was performed (Affymetrix®, HG U133 Plus 2.0, probesets #1: 223824, #2: 227458, detecting different transcripts of the PD-L1 gene); maximum likelihood method was used for cut off determination. Correlations with IHC and TILs were tested using Spearman´s rank correlation. Survival analysis included recurrence free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS), considering only those patients who received chemotherapy (n=76). Median follow up was 73 months (20-127).
Results
In IHC analysis, half of the samples were classified PD-L1 positive for IC and CPS (50.6% and 49.4%) and only 23.5% considering TPS. In probeset #1, 63.5% were determined PD-L1 positive, no correlation to the IHC scores, TILs and probeset #2 was shown. In probeset #2 only 34.1% showed a PD-L1 positivity and had a strong correlation to the IHC scores and to TILs (p<0.01). PD-L1 positivity had no impact on survival when determined by IHC scores or probeset #2. In contrast, patients with high PD-L1 expression in probeset #1 had a more favourable 7-years RFI probability (84.6% vs 64.3%). Low PD-L1 expression showed higher risk for recurrence in univariate (2.68, 95%CI 1.089-7.532) and multivariate analysis (3.43, 95%CI 1.294-9.080, adjusted to nodal status). Considering OS only a trend was shown (HR 1.445, 95%CI 0.570-3.662).
Conclusions
In our cohort, the PD-L1 mRNA analysis detected additional PD-L1 positive tumours compared to IHC analysis. For validation of the prognostic impact and to examine the predictive value considering therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, further studies are warranted.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01592825 release date 16.12.2009.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
M. Vetter, E. Kantelhardt.
Funding
Wilhelm Roux Program of the Medical Faculty Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (grant number FKZ 25/36), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant number Med FKZ 031A429).
Disclosure
C. Thomssen: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurikamed, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Jörg Eickeler, Hexal, Lilly, Medupdate, MSD, Nanostring, Novartis, Onkowissen, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Vifor; Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: Forum Sanitas; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: AGO Breast Committee, ASCO, DGGG (Germ Soc OB/GYN), DGS (Germ Soc Senology), DKG (Germ Cancer Soc), EORTC PathoBiomarker Group; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of Board of Directors: AGO -B Breast Study Group; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Officer: BIG; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: ESO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: ESMO. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
252P - Adjuvant chemotherapy in T1a/bN0 breast cancer patients with high oncotype DX recurrence scores (RS>25)
Presenter: Daniela Katz
Session: Poster session 02
253P - Is 6-weekly administration of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer safe? A real-world early comparison of q6w versus q3w administration of pembrolizumab in two large cancer centres in the UK
Presenter: Vasileios Angelis
Session: Poster session 02
254P - Effects of delaying adjuvant chemotherapy initiation on clinical outcomes in early triple-negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Maria Eleni Hatzipanagiotou
Session: Poster session 02
255P - Prognostic stratification capacity of the CPS+EG scoring system in HER2-low and HER2-zero early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Nicolas Roussot
Session: Poster session 02
256P - Evolution and risk stratification of adjuvant treatment strategies for early breast cancer: A Chinese perspective based on a national cancer database
Presenter: Ying Fan
Session: Poster session 02
257P - The characteristics of HER2-positive microinvasive breast cancer and the necessity of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in these patients: A real-world study
Presenter: Bo Lan
Session: Poster session 02
258P - Cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab for high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer in Colombia
Presenter: Ricardo Brugés Maya
Session: Poster session 02
259P - Adjuvant doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early-stage breast cancer provides long-term cardiac safety
Presenter: Thiti Susiriwatananont
Session: Poster session 02
260P - Oncology efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in hormone receptor-positive very young breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Hee Jun Choi
Session: Poster session 02
261P - Dysregulation of immune checkpoint proteins in newly- diagnosed early breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A comparison between TNBC and non-TNBC patients
Presenter: Bernardo Rapoport
Session: Poster session 02