Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

491P - Comparison of ctDNA profiles from HR+/HER2-low and HR+/HER2-0 advanced breast cancer patients

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cancer Biology;  Translational Research;  Molecular Oncology;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Nina Dobrić

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S334-S390. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01260-7

Authors

N. Dobrić1, N. Dandachi1, E.V. Klocker1, C. Suppan1, R. Graf2, S. Hasenleithner3, P.J. Jost1, E. Heitzer2, M. Balic1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 - Graz/AT
  • 2 Institute Of Human Genetics, Medical University of Graz, 8010 - Graz/AT
  • 3 Institute Of Human Genetics, Medical University of Graz, 8036 - Graz/AT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 491P

Background

Despite the substantial progress in systemic treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, a significant proportion of patients has dismal prognosis. A meaningful proportion of these patients has HER2-low disease. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiles between HER2-low and HER2-0 have not yet been comprehensively investigated.

Methods

67 plasma samples from 59 metastatic breast cancer patients (HR+/HER2-low, n=53; HR+/HER2-0, n=14) were collected either before starting 1st line or 2nd line treatment. Tumor fractions were assessed using an untargeted aneuploidy screening and expressed as z-scores (mFAST-SeqS). The mutational landscape of ctDNA was established using a 77-gene panel (AVENIO ctDNA Expanded). Tumor fractions, the number of somatic variants and variant allele frequencies (VAF) were compared between HER2-low and HER2-0 patients.

Results

HER2-low patients had significantly higher z-scores compared to HER2-0 patients (median 3.22 vs. 1.65, rank-sum p-value 0.025). In contrast, neither the highest nor the average VAF differed significantly between the two groups. HER2-low patients had a median of 3 detected variants (range 1-20), with a median of 2 clonal (range 0-9) and 1 subclonal (range 0-19) variants. HER2-0 patients presented with a median of 5 variants (range 1-12), including a median of 3 clonal (range 1-4) and 1 subclonal (range 0-8) variants. In contrast to previous reports, PIK3CA mutations were more prevalent in HER2-0 patients (57.1%) compared to HER2-low patients (35.8%), whereas TP53 mutations were identified at the same extent with 28.6% in HER2-0 and 22.6% in HER2-low patients.

Conclusions

Our results suggest a significant difference in the tumor fractions in plasma between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients. Moreover, the mutational landscape of our cohort revealed differences from previous reports, indicating that further investigations are needed to elucidate and establish the distinct features of HER2-low breast tumors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Medical University of Graz.

Funding

AstraZeneca / Daiichi Sankyo.

Disclosure

N. Dandachi: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel support: Daiichi Sankyo. E.V. Klocker: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel fee: Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Travel fee: Pierre Fabre. C. Suppan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca. P.J. Jost: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ariad, AbbVie, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Roche, BMS and Celgene, CBmed, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Boehringer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Daiichi; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties, Minimal contribution to Venetoclax patent: The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim Abbvie, Novartis. E. Heitzer: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Servier, Freenome, PreAnalytixX; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples, Provision of reagents: Roche Diagnostics, Illumina. M. Balic: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Pierre FABRE, Pfizer, Roche, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Coordinating PI, Steering Committee Member, Coordinating PI, Advisory role: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Roche, MSD, Qiagen, Amgen, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Pierre FABRE, Novartis, Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.