Abstract 96P
Background
To compare the doublet gemcitabine and cisplatin which is a standard of care in locally advanced or metastatic gall bladder cancer to a triplet gemcitabine, cisplatin and nab paclitaxel regime which has shown promising results in a single arm phase II study.
Methods
A total of 60 patients with locally advanced or metastatic gall bladder cancer were randomized 30 in each arm after imaging [contrast enhanced CT scan of chest, abdomen, and pelvis / MRI abdomen and pelvis with CECT chest /whole-body PET CT scan] and biopsy. Arm A received two drugs gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 i.v and cisplatin 25mg/m2 i.v on Day1 and Day8 of 21-day cycle and arm B received three drugs gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 , cisplatin, 25 mg/m2 , and nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2 , on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycle. Evaluation was done post 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Then patients were followed up every 6 months for 2 years period for assessment of primary and secondary endpoints of the study.
Results
The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (arm A) showed an overall radiological response rate (complete response and partial response) of 13.3% while it was 61.9 % in patients who received gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel. This difference was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.004. The median progression-free survival for the patients who received gemcitabine and cisplatin was 4.5 months (95% CI, 4.0-4.9) vs 7.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-11.2) for the patients who were treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel. This difference was statistically significant with a p-value of ≤ 0.05. The median overall survival for the doublet was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.6-15.7) vs not reached for the patients who were treated with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel. There was no increase in grade 3 adverse events with the addition of nab-paclitaxel.
Conclusions
To conclude, our study showed that the triplet chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel was significantly better in terms of overall response rate, and median progression-free survival with a longer follow up needed to comment on median overall survival.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2021/09/036362.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Khatri.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
107P - Comprehensive genomic profiling of “The German-registry of incidental gallbladder carcinoma” cases
Presenter: Nihat Bugra Agaoglu
Session: Poster session 17
108P - FGFR2 fusions and their impact on efficacy of standard chemotherapy in patients with biliary tract cancer
Presenter: Binbin Zheng-Lin
Session: Poster session 17
109P - DNA damage repair pathways in biliary tract cancer: A new target for precision medicine?
Presenter: Ilektra Mavroeidi
Session: Poster session 17
110P - Detection of HER2 overexpression in biliary tract cancers: Comparison of AmoyDx® HER-2 (29D8) assay with ventana PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) assay
Presenter: Hui Dong
Session: Poster session 17
111P - The concordance between circulating tumor DNA and tissue genomic profiling in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer
Presenter: Seonjeong Woo
Session: Poster session 17
112P - Clinical, genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of young-onset biliary tract cancers
Presenter: Thomas Pudlarz
Session: Poster session 17
113P - Molecular profiling of biliary tract cancers in patients of African and European ancestries
Presenter: Zishuo Hu
Session: Poster session 17
114P - Prospective longitudinal tumor-informed ctDNA in resectable biliary tract cancers
Presenter: Gentry King
Session: Poster session 17
115P - Inhibition of KLF5 reduces tumor growth and sensitizes to chemotherapy-induced cell death in experimental models of cholangiocarcinoma
Presenter: Ana Landa Magdalena
Session: Poster session 17
116P - Circulating tumour DNA- based minimal residual disease detection for biliary tract cancer
Presenter: Zhishuai Li
Session: Poster session 17