Abstract 574P
Background
We have previously reported significant differences between the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of primary colorectal cancer (CRC-P) and different metastatic sites. Increased immune cell infiltration, B-cells, and CD8 cells and decreased macrophages were noted in CRC-P and lung metastatic (LuM) lesions compared to liver (LM) and peritoneum (PM) metastases. We expanded our work to MSI CRC and compared their TIME to respective MSS tumor sites.
Methods
De-identified cases of MSS and MSI metastatic CRC that underwent next-generation sequencing with the Tempus xT assay were selected from the Tempus Database. Gene expression patterns of immune cells, including B, T (CD4+, CD8+), NK cells, and macrophages, were used to predict relative intra-tumor abundance. MSI and MSS cohorts included CRC-P, LM, and PM. LuM was analyzed only in MSS tumors due to the limited number of MSI LuM. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), neoantigen burden, and proportion of immune cells in CRC-P, LM, and PM were compared across MSI and MSS patients. Chi-squared/Fischer’s exact tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess statistical significance.
Results
A total of 208 MSI and 6,732 MSS tumors were subject of analysis. No differences were noted in TMB, neoantigen load, or PD-L1 expression between MSI CRC-P, LM, or PM. Across the 3 tissue groups, the median TMB and neoantigen tumor burden were significantly higher in MSI cohorts when compared to MSS cohorts (p<0.001). Compared to MSS LM, MSI LM exhibited a higher percentage of CD8 cells (p=0.002) and NK cells (p<0.001), with a trend towards a lower percentage of macrophages (p=0.14). Similar differences were noted for MSI PM compared to MSS PM (CD8 cells p=0.018, NK cells p=0.044 and macrophages p=0.023). The TIME of MSS LuM lesions shared more similarities with that of MSI LM/PM than MSS LM/PM.
Conclusions
MSI LM and PM have a more favorable TIME than respective MSS metastases, explaining the discordance in response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and reported CPI benefits in MSI cases across all metastatic sites. MSS LuM have a comparable TIME to MSI metastatic sites, explaining the recently reported benefits from CPI therapy in this group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Fakih: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consultant: AstraZeneca, Bayer Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, One meeting: Eisai Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, One meeting: Entos, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Xenthera; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Also Editorial Boards & Consulting: Mirati Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Nouscom, Roche / Genentech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting: Pfizer, Taiho Oncology; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AgenusBio, Genentech / imCORE, Verastem. M. Huang, J. Mercer: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Tempus Labs. M.A. Thompson: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Insight Myeloma Registry: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Registry: Adaptive; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, Epizyme, Janssen, Sanofi, GRAIL/Illumina; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Reviewer; Prior co-chair of Myeloma, Lymphoma, ITP committees: Elsevier Clinical Path (prior: VIA Oncology); Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, VP of Clinical Partnerships: Tempus; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Doximity, Tempus; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties, Myeloma Reviewer: UpToDate; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: AbbVie, Amgen, Denovo, GSK, Hoosier Research Network, Janssen, Lilly, LynxBio, Takeda, TG Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, , Member of Board of Directors: ASCO; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Doximity; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Syapse Precision Medicine Council - 2018-2021: Syapse; Non-Financial Interests, Sponsor/Funding, ASCO PAC: ASCO. J. Gong: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astellas, QED Therapeutics, Exelixis, Amgen, AVEO, Basilea Pharmaceutical, EMD Serono, HalioDx, Janssen Biotech, Natera, Bayer, Pfizer/Myovant, Incyte, Eisai, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: Elsevier; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: OncLive/MJH Life Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10