Abstract 1095P
Background
PRADO tested neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in 99 stage III melanoma patients (pts) followed by omission of therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) and adjuvant therapy in pts achieving a major pathologic response (MPR) in their index lymph node, and addition of adjuvant therapy after TLND in non-responding (pNR) pts. Previous analyses of PRADO and its previous OpACIN-neo trial showed that a high interferon-gamma (IFN-y) signature, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were associated with major pathologic response (PD-L1 expression only in PRADO). Here, we report the association between these biomarkers and 3-year (3y) survival of PRADO.
Methods
The IFN-y signature, PD-L1 expression and TMB were analyzed on baseline tumor biopsies using mRNA sequencing (n=80), anti-PD-L1 mAb (clone 22C3) (n=76), and whole exome sequencing (n=75). Cutoffs between high and low cohorts were calculated using ROC curves on MPR. Event-free (EFS), relapse-free (RFS), distant metastasis-free (DMFS) and overall (OS) survival curves were generated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank method.
Results
Pts with a high baseline IFN-y signature or a PD-L1 expression of ≥1% had a significantly higher 3y EFS rate than pts with low levels (85% vs 61%, p=0.006 and 91% vs 67%, p=0.005, respectively) (Table). Pts with a high TMB had a numerically higher 3y EFS rate (81% vs 64%, p=0.072). The correlation between baseline IFN-y signature and PD-L1 expression and EFS translated into a numerical benefit in RFS, DMFS and OS (OS was statistically significant for PD-L1). However, no association with RFS, DMFS or OS was observed for TMB. Table: 1095P
3-year survival rate estimate | Log-rank p-value | ||
Registration-to-event analyses | |||
IFN-y | High (n=39) | Low (n=41) | |
EFS | 85% | 61% | 0.006 |
OS | 95% | 80% | 0.059 |
PDL1 | ≥1% (n=33) | <1% (n=43) | |
EFS | 91% | 67% | 0.005 |
OS | 100% | 81% | 0.010 |
TMB | High (n=31) | Low (n=44) | |
EFS | 81% | 64% | 0.072 |
OS | 87% | 86% | 0.940 |
Surgery-to-event analyses* | |||
IFN-y | High (n=39) | Low (n=34) | |
RFS | 85% | 70% | 0.066 |
DMFS | 90% | 73% | 0.053 |
PDL1 | ≥1% (n=32) | <1% (n=37) | |
RFS | 91% | 78% | 0.068 |
DMFS | 94% | 84% | 0.130 |
TMB | High (n=29) | Low (n=39) | |
RFS | 83% | 72% | 0.210 |
DMFS | 86% | 77% | 0.320 |
*Patients with an event prior to surgery (n=6) or who did not undergo surgery (n=1) were excluded.
Conclusions
The IFN-y signature seems to be the most robust baseline biomarker for long-term (event-free) survival across different cohorts. In contrast to results from the previous OpACIN-neo trial, PD-L1 expression was also associated with survival in PRADO, while TMB was not significantly associated.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02977052.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
BMS.
Disclosure
I. Reijers: Financial Interests, Personal, Licensing Fees, I.L.M.R reports financial interest in Signature Oncology, and will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature Oncology. P. Dimitriadis: Financial Interests, Personal, Licensing Fees, P.D. reports financial interest in Signature Oncology, and will receive some possible revenues if the IFN-γ signature is being developed as clinical companion diagnostic: Signature Oncology. A.M. Menzies: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory board: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics. E. Kapiteijn: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Delcath, Bayer, Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Pierre Fabre, Delcath. A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Merck, Roche, Eisai, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Ipsen. K.P.M. Suijkerbuijk: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, BMS, AbbVie, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, TigaTx. G.A.P. Hospers: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Roche, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, Seerave. W. Van Houdt: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Belpharma, Sanofi, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: BMS. R. Saw: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, Novartis, QBiotics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, Novartis. B. van de Wiel: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS. R. Scolyer: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Evaxion, Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Australia, QBiotics, Novartis, MSD, NeraCare, Amgen, BMS, Myriad Genetics, GSK. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, MSD - Merck, Merck-Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sirius Medical, 4SC, Provectus; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, NIVEC study: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck-Pfizer. G.V. Long: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Evaxion, Hexal AG, Highlight Therapeutics, Innovent Biologics, MSD, Novartis, OncoSec, PHMR Ltd., Pierre Fabre, Provectus, QBiotics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. C.U. Blank: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Third Rock Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Immagene; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, intention to develop IFN signature algorithm: NewCo, no name yet; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS, Novartis, NanoString, 4SC; Other, pending patent: WO 2021/177822 A1. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
921P - HB-200 arenavirus-based immunotherapy plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16 positive head and neck cancer
Presenter: Lisle Nabell
Session: Poster session 12
922P - Dose expansion results of the bifunctional EGFR/TGFβ inhibitor BCA101 with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Glenn Hanna
Session: Poster session 12
923P - Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with vorinostat in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma – subgroup analysis of the PEVOsq basket trial
Presenter: Christophe Le Tourneau
Session: Poster session 12
924P - Polyfunctional HPV16-Specific T cell responses in subjects receiving PDS0101 and pembrolizumab combination treatment for recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Presenter: Kevin Harrington
Session: Poster session 12
925P - Treatment discontinuation of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma experiencing complete or nearly complete remission
Presenter: Konrad Klinghammer
Session: Poster session 12
926P - UK national real-world outcome data of first-line pembrolizumab treatment in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Ifigenia Vasiliadou
Session: Poster session 12
927P - Patients (pts) with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with nivolumab (NIVO) in the first-line (1L) or later-line (2L+) settings in Germany: Updated results from the real-world HANNA study
Presenter: Boris Kubuschok
Session: Poster session 12
928P - Prognostic value of body composition and nutritional assessment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with immunotherapy (IO)
Presenter: Zara Vidales Sepulveda
Session: Poster session 12
930P - Platinum and taxane (PT) plus immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Marcelo Bonomi
Session: Poster session 12