Abstract 298P
Background
Low level of HER2+ breast cancer, a subset of HER-2 negative, accounts for about 50-60% of breast cancer. A recent publication highlighting the improved survival outcomes with trastuzumab deruxtecan in this group has raised the need to redefine low HER2+ breast cancer in the context of molecular characterization. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we compared molecular TNBC subtype, PAM50 subtypes, and clinical-pathological characteristics between the low HER2 and zero HER2 groups.
Methods
A study population included two cohorts with early TNBC. The adjuvant cohort consisted of 199 TNBC patients who underwent upfront surgery, while the neoadjuvant cohort comprised 124 TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Transcriptome analysis was conducted in the adjuvant cohort to determine the TNBC molecular subtype and PAM50 types. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels, PD-L1, and Ki67 expression were evaluated in both cohorts, along with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS) investigations in each cohort.
Results
In 199 patients with transcriptome analysis, 66 (33.2%) had low HER2 disease, while 133 (66.8%) had zero HER2 tumors. The rates of luminal androgen receptor (LAR) and HER2-E subtypes were 13.1% (26/199) and 7.0% (14/199), respectively. Comparing the two groups, low HER2 tumors showed higher rates of LAR (22.7% vs. 8.5%, p=0.006) and HER2-E (15.2% vs. 3.3%, p=0.016), while other characteristics such as TIL, PD-L1, ROR-P score, and Ki67 did not differ between the two groups. In the neoadjuvant cohort, 31 (25.0%) had low HER2 disease while 93 (75.0%) had zero HER2 tumors, and there were no significant differences in TIL, PD-L1, and Ki67 expression between the two groups. Furthermore, low HER2 status did not significantly affect RFS and EFS in either cohort.
Conclusions
Low HER2 status in TNBC is distinctly associated with enriched LAR and HER2-E subtypes. However, other characteristics such as TIL, PD-L1, and Ki67 expression, as well as survival outcomes, were found to be similar between the two groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
304P - Generalizability of 313-SNP PRS for breast cancer risk in non-European ancestries
Presenter: Helen Shang
Session: Poster session 02
305P - Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer
Presenter: Sora Kang
Session: Poster session 02
307P - Identifying new biological subgroups of triple-negative breast cancer using next-generation integrative clustering pipeline
Presenter: Xixuan Zhu
Session: Poster session 02
308P - Regression-based deep-learning predicts breast cancer recurrence risk score from pathology slides
Presenter: Omar El Nahhas
Session: Poster session 02
310P - Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA in early breast cancer using a plasma-only methylation-based assay
Presenter: Mitchell Elliott
Session: Poster session 02
311P - Multinational survey study assessing genetic testing and counselling among patients (pts) with breast cancer (MAGENTA): Results on the genetic counselling experience
Presenter: Ranjit Kaur
Session: Poster session 02
312P - Prediction model of breast cancer patient’s neoadjuvant treatment outcome using breast cancer organoids cultured from core needle biopsies
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 02
313P - Intrinsic subtypes in a cohort of early breast cancer patients
Presenter: Theresa Bracht
Session: Poster session 02