Abstract 569P
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed to distinguish MMR-D from MMR-P (proficient) tumors, yet they lack biological interpretability. To address this shortcoming, we used validated AI algorithms to detect and quantify well described morphological features in colon cancers from whole slide images.
Methods
Digital images of stage III colon carcinomas from participants in a phase III trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy (NCCTG N0147; Alliance) were utilized. Available MMR-D (n=191) and randomly selected MMR-P (n=188) cancers were analyzed. QuantCRC quantifies the amount of stroma and stromal subtypes (immature, mature, inflammatory) and tumor/stroma ratio in addition to grade, mucin, signet ring cells, budding/poorly differentiated clusters (TB/PDC) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). We also distinguished TILs in epithelium vs stromal using another AI algorithm (Lunit SCOPE IO). Area under the curve (AUC), i.e., discrimination threshold, was measured for each feature to predict MMR status.
Results
Among AI-derived morphological features, significant differences were found by MMR status whereby dMMR cancers had lower immature stroma but higher inflammatory stroma, higher tumor grade, and increased mucin, signet ring cells, tumor size, TB/PDCs, and TILs (all Kruskal-Wallis p<0.05). Univariately, AUC (95% CI) values for prediction of MMR status above 0.6 were as follows: TILs 0.72 (0.67-0.77), immature stroma 0.67 (0.62-0.73); inflammatory stroma 0.67 (0.62-0.73); tumor grade 0.65 (0.60-0.71); signet ring cells 0.65 (0.60-0.71); mucin 0.64 (0.59-0.70). Given that TILs in the overall tumor was most discriminant, we then utilized a TIL-specific AI algorithm measuring TILs in epithelium and stroma and found that epithelial TILs had a significantly higher AUC [ 0.79 (0.74-0.84) compared to stromal TILs 0.58 (0.52-0.63) p<0.0001].
Conclusions
Among morphological tumor features quantified by AI, tumor immature desmoplastic stroma and TILs, particularly epithelial TIL densities, were best able to distinguish MMR-D from MMR-P tumors. These findings have implications for prognosis and subtype-based interventions and can guide spatial molecular interrogation.
Clinical trial identification
NCT00079274.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Supported by Institutional grant support. NIH U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, R01 CA210509 (to FAS). Study NCCTG N0147 received funds from Sanofi.
Disclosure
G. Park, Y. Lim: Financial Interests, Institutional, Member: Lunit. D. Yan, K. Shanmugam: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Roche. C-Y. Ock: Financial Interests, Institutional, Member: Lunit. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10