Abstract 1098P
Background
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) with immunotherapy (anti-PD1-based) has shown promising event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in resectable melanoma patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate anti-PD1-based NAT for stage III and IV resectable melanoma.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for clinical trials and observational cohort studies. Outcomes of interest were pCR, major pathologic response (MPR), EFS, and overall survival (OS). Subgroups analysis included clinical stages and mucosal and acral melanomas (MM/AM) subpopulation. Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics; We used a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model.
Results
Eleven studies were included, comprising nine phase II/Ib clinical trials and two observational cohort studies with 486 patients. Of them, 85% had cutaneous melanoma, and 15% had MM/AM. Overall, 43% received single-agent NAT. In a pooled analysis, the pCR rate was 35.1% (95%CI 25.7-44.4). Stage III patients achieved a pCR of 36.9% (95%CI 28.9-71.5), whereas studies including stages III/IV reported pCR in 34.1% (95%CI 19.9-48.4). Single-agent therapy led to pCR in 30.5% (95%CI 20.2-40.9) of patients, while those treated with combination therapy had a pCR rate of 42.1% (95%CI 25.6-58.5). MPR was reached in 49.0% (95% 39.6-58.5) of patients. 231 (82.4%) remained free-of-events with a minimum follow-up of 14.6 months. OS was 90.1% (95%CI 86.0-93.1) in two years (27 deaths). Overall pathological response (CR+MPR+PR) was seen in 71.2% (95%CI 63.5-79.0) of patients, and the overall radiographic response in 50.8% (95%Cl 45.0-56.5). According to pCR, responders had a greater EFS than non-responders with an OR of 0.10 (95%CI 0.02-0.49 p=0.004). Among MM/AM, 19.9% (95%CI 7.8-34.9) of patients had pCR. There were no treatment-related deaths or delays of surgery.
Conclusions
Our study supports anti-PD1-based NAT anti-tumor activity in patients with resectable melanoma. Patients with pCR and stage III seem to benefit most from NAT, while rare melanomas still have a worse response. Other ongoing studies and more mature data are needed to confirm our findings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M.F. Ribeiro: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
931P - Early recurrence, time-to-recurrence, and recurrence patterns: Assessing their impact on survival outcomes in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) patients
Presenter: Pasvich Pitakpaiboonkul
Session: Poster session 12
932P - Survival in patients with relapsed/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with pembrolizumab or cetuximab-based therapy: A real-worlddata study with the TriNetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 12
934P - Antitumor activity and safety profile of camrelizumab plus docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine for induction therapy in advanced stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma
Presenter: Hongli Gong
Session: Poster session 12
938P - Nivolumab (nivo) in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCHN): real-world effectiveness, quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers in France (ProNiHN study)
Presenter: Christophe Le Tourneau
Session: Poster session 12
939P - Efficacy and safety of a novel anti-EGFR ADC MRG003 in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck patients
Presenter: Liqiong Xue
Session: Poster session 12
940P - Salvage chemotherapy after progression on nivolumab in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck included in the phase II TOPNIVO trial
Presenter: Khalil Saleh
Session: Poster session 12