Abstract 1106P
Background
Liver mets have been associated with poor response and survival in pts with MM treated with PD1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab; PD1+IPI). Whether these pts benefit from PD1+IPI over PD1 is unknown. In MM pts with liver metastases, we sought to: a) determine objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) to PD1 vs PD1+IPI, and b) identify clinical predictors of response and survival to PD1+/-IPI.
Methods
MM pts with liver mets treated with 1st line PD1 or PD1+IPI were included. Demographics, patient and disease characteristics, baseline blood parameters and clinical outcomes were examined. Univariate and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors of response and survival.
Results
Of 533 MM pts treated with 1st line PD1 or PD1+IPI; 284 (53%) had PD1 and 249 (47%) had PD1+IPI. PD1 group had more ECOG PS ≥1 (53% vs 34%), but less BRAF V600 mutation (15% vs 33%) and stage M1D (15% vs 31%). Median follow-up from commencement of PD1+/-IPI was 47 months (42–51); ORR was 41%, higher in PD1+IPI (47%) vs PD1 (35%) (p=0.0027). PFS and OS at 1 year were 68% and 40%, respectively; non statistically higher with PD1+IPI (69%/43%) vs PD1 (67%/38%) (p>0.05). However, on MVA with multiple imputation for missing values and adjusting for predefined variables including age, gender, melanoma subtype (cutaneous non-acral, acral and mucosal), mutation status, ECOG PS, LDH and M1 substage (M1c versus M1d), PD1+IPI was associated with higher ORR (OR 2.21, 1.46 – 3.36; p<0.001), PFS (HR 0.73, 0.57 – 0.92; p=0.009) and OS (HR 0.71, 0.54 – 0.94; p=0.018) compared to PD1. Age (ORR, PFS), ECOG PS (OS), LDH (PFS, OS), M1 substage (ORR, PFS, OS), mutation status (PFS), melanoma subtype (OS) were also independent predictors of response and/or survival. Most pts ceased treatment due to progression (262 [53%]), and more pts stopped treatment due to toxicity in the PD1+IPI (n=77, 31%) vs PD1 (n=36, 14%) group.
Conclusions
In pts with liver metastases, 1st line PD1+IPI showed higher ORR and improved survival compared with PD1 alone. These data will help guide treatment selection for pts with melanoma liver metastases.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
I. Pires da Silva: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: BMS, Roche. S. Ugurel-Becker: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck Serono, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, meeting and travel support: Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, IGEA Clinical Biophysics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma. M. Carlino: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, BMS, Eisai, IDEAYA, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, OncoSec, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics, Regeneron, Roche, Merck, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis. A.M. Menzies: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory board: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics. M. Weichenthal: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Sun Pharma, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Millennium, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis. P. Mohr: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Roche, Sun Pharma, Sanofi. R. Gutzmer: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Merck Serono, Almirall Hermal GmbH, Amgen, Sun Pharma, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Immunocore, 4SC; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Pfizer, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Merck Serono, Sun Pharma, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma. A.M. Arance Fernandez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consultant /Advisory/Speaker/Travel, Accommodation, Expenses/: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Roche, BMS, MSD, Merck, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Research Funding: Pierre Fabre, Novartis, MSD, BMS, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Amgen. D. Johnson: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Catalyst Biopharma, Iovance, Jansen, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Mosaic ImmunoEngineering, Novartis, OncoSec, Pfizer, Targovax, Teiko; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding: BMS, Incyte. P. Lorigan: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Novartis, Pierre Fabre, BMS, MSD, Melagenix GmbH, Ultimovacs, MLA Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: BMS, Pierre Fabre. D. Schadendorf: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Roche, Merck Serono, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, MSD, Immunocore, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi/Regeneron, Pfizer, Philogen, Neracare; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Novartis, BMS, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Sanofi, Philogen; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: EORTC-MG. G.V. Long: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Evaxion Biotech, Hexal AG, Highlight Therapeutics, Innovent Biologics, MSD, Novartis Pharma, OncoSec, PHMR, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, QBiotics, Regeneron. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13
1139P - Final results of a phase II study of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs)
Presenter: Eve Maubec
Session: Poster session 13