Abstract 1304P
Background
In inoperable stage III NSCLC, the standard of care is chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant durvalumab (IO) for 12 months. Pneumonitis is the commonest toxicity leading to IO discontinuation. Failure to distinguish between radiation-induced changes, IO pneumonitis and infection can lead to unnecessary IO discontinuation. We investigated use of a structured multidisciplinary review of CT-scans, radiation dose distributions and clinical symptoms for the diagnosis of IO pneumonitis.
Methods
An ethics-approved retrospective study was conducted at an academic medical center for stage III NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant IO between 2018-2021. A thoracic radiologist reviewed baseline and follow-up chest CT-scans, systematically scored radiological features suspected for pneumonitis using a published classification system ( Veiga C, Radioth Onc 2018 ), and had access to the radiation dose distributions. Next, two thoracic oncologists reviewed each patients’ case record, CT-scans and radiation fields. A final consensus diagnosis incorporating views of expert clinicians and the radiologist was made. IO pneumonitis was diagnosed only when both the radiologist and pulmonologists were in agreement.
Results
Among the 45 included patients, 14/45 (31.1%) had a pneumonitis scored in patient records. IO was discontinued in 11/45 cases (24.4%). Review by the radiologist led to a diagnosis of IO pneumonitis only in 6/45 patients (13.3%). Review by thoracic oncologists led to a diagnosis of IO pneumonitis in only 4/45 patients (8.9%). In addition, a suspicion of an immune-related pneumonitis was rejected in 3 separate patients (6.7%), after the thoracic oncologists had reviewed the patient's radiation fields.
Conclusions
In patients treated using the PACIFIC regimen, multidisciplinary assessment of CT-scans, radiation doses and patient symptoms, resulted in fewer diagnoses of immune-related pneumonitis (8.9%). In contrast, routine clinical assessment by treating pulmonary oncologists led to discontinuation of IO in 24.4% of patients. This highlights the need for multidisciplinary review in order to avoid inappropriate cessation of adjuvant IO.
Clinical trial identification
IRB00002991.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Suresh Senan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
I. Bahce: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca. S. Senan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Ad boards on SCLC and NSCLC: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Panel to assess treatment toxicity: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, NSCLC presentation: Jansen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Adjudication of lung toxicity in non-metastatic lung cancer: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Funded PhD studentship to study patterns of care in early-stage lung cancer: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Funded trials evaluating in preoperative chemo-immune-radiotherapy and in radio-immunotherapy in stage IV NSCLC: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Co-PI of an institutional trial evaluating a palliative radiotherapy workflow: Varian Medical Systems; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Co-PI of an institutional trial evaluating immune effects of ablative radiotherapy of adrenal metastases: ViewRay Inc; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Co-investigator for a phase III trial evaluating adjuvant immunotherapy in SCLC: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04