Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 18

1764P - The vanishing clinical value of PD-L1 status as predictive biomarker in first-line treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 18

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Tumour Immunology;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Alexander Tamalunas

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S785-S807. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1080

Authors

A. Tamalunas, M. Götz, S. Rodler, C.G. Stief, J. Casuscelli

Author affiliations

  • Urology, University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, 81377 - Munich/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1764P

Background

Since the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for systemic treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) in 2017, the clinical value of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) as biomarker remains controversial. In 2018 European Medicines Agency (EMA) restricted approval of first-line pembrolizumab and atezolizumab in Cisplatin-ineligible patients to PD-L1 positive tumors, defined as either combined positive score (CPS) >/=10 or immune cell (IC) score 2/3. We aimed to address the clinical significance of PD-L1 positivity in patients with advanced UCB.

Methods

Patients with advanced UCB were prospectively enrolled, following radical cystectomy (RC) from January 2018 to December 2020 at our tertiary referral center. Clinical outcome defined as progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on systemic treatment was analyzed using the χ2-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

PD-L1-status was analyzed as CPS and IC-score in 141 patients (43.5%) with high-risk (pT3–pT4 and/or N+) or metastatic UCB. While median PFS was 17.5 months (95%CI 11.0-24.1) for PD-L1+ patients who received ICI in 1-L, PD-L1- or PD-L1+ patients who received chemotherapy in 1-L had PFS of 3.8 (IQR 2.3-5.2) and 3.4 months (95%CI 2.9-3.9), respectively.Regardless of treatment, mean OS for PD-L1+ patients was 23.7 months (95%CI 14.9-32.5) vs. 18.2 (95%CI 5.7-30.7) for PD-L1- patients (p=0.592). Median OS with 1-L ICI was 27.2 months (95%CI 12.7-41.7) vs. 17.2 months (95%CI 10.9-23.5) with 1-L chemotherapy (p=0.311).

Conclusions

We could show that PFS largely depended on the kind of treatment given to patients, but observed no difference in OS regardless of treatment or PD-L1 status. However, the fact that PD-L1 negative patients responded to anti-PD-L1 therapy, underlines the need for reliable predictive biomarkers for agents targeting this pathway.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.