Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 19

CN79 - Patients' experience of hope during cancer treatment: The different dimensions of hope

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 19

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Aida Shahriari

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S827-S836. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1046

Authors

A. Shahriari, E.M. Selenius

Author affiliations

  • Me Bäckencancer, Tema Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 - Solna/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN79

Background

The authors work as oncolocy contact nurses at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. During the specialist nursing education in oncological care, we became aware that hope is a central concept in care science and this has aroused a curiosity to study the significance of hope. The common preconception regarding the experience of hope is that patients undergoing cancer treatment most of all hope to recover. We hope this study can contribute to a deeper and more multidimensional understanding of patients' experience of hope. We also hope that this knowledge leads to an improved and person-centered nursing in the meeting with the patient in the oncological context. Hope is essential to experiencing health and alleviates suffering. Cancer causes existential suffering. Nurses can be bearers of hope, however, nurses in cancer care experience that it can be difficult to define what hope means to the patient and this can cause ethical issues.

Methods

The study was conducted as a qualitative literature review in accordance with Bettany-Saltikov and McSherry (2016). Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed and CINAHL. 10 studies were included. The studies were quality reviewed based on the template designed by Caldwell et al. (2011). Analysis was performed in accordance with Bettany-Saltikov and McSherry's (2016) description of Burnard's (1991) analysis method.

Results

Four categories were identified. The importance of cancer treatment for the experience of hope showed that the cancer treatment affected the hope of, among other things, living and surviving. The changing hope showed that patients felt that hope changed through the cancer trajectory and gave new perspectives. Hope as a driving force showed that spirituality could be a source of hope and that hope was a vital force. The importance of relationships for the experience of hope showed how relationships with relatives and care staff affected experiences of hope.

Conclusions

Hope has a deep and multidimensional significance for patients undergoing cancer treatment. This knowledge can contribute to an improved and person-centered nursing in the oncological context, which in turn can promote the patient's experience of hope.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.