Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 19

CN56 - Patients' and contact nurses' (CN) views on opportunities for patient participation in cancer care: An on-going study

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 19

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management;  Communication Skills

Tumour Site

Presenters

Bodil Westman

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S820-S826. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1045

Authors

B. Westman1, M. Bergenmar1, K. Bergkvist1, L. Sharp2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Care Science, Sophiahemmet Universty, 114 86 - Stockholm/SE
  • 2 Cancer Care Improvments, RCC Stockholm-Gotland, HSF, 102 39 - Stockholm/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN56

Background

Research suggests varied possibilities for Swedish patients to participate in their own care, with many expressing lacking possibilities to participate to the preferred extent. Identifying individual preferences on how, to what degree, and in what situations the patients want to participate in their cancer care, are crucial in person-centred care. Patients’ activation level (measured with PAM-13) has been found to be associated with perceived patient participation. The cancer contact nurses (CNs) perceptions of patients’ needs and preferences for participation are important to optimise the communication between themselves and the patients. The overall aim for the project is to describe patients' experiences of participation. For this study we wanted to investigate levels of agreement/disagreements between patients’ and CNs’ of estimated opportunities for participation at the care encounter before starting cancer treatment and to explore how patients with “low” or “high” activation level, described their opportunities for participation in the meeting with the CN.

Methods

Agreement of patient-nurse dyads, is assessed by dyadicOption, a 12-item scale with five-point response options and one open question. The instrument includes the same items, however, phrased differently for patients and CNs respectively and is completed immediately after each care encounter. Semi-structured interviews, regarding experiences of possibilities for participation in the encounter with the CN, are performed with patients using purposeful sampling, with low-high PAM score respectively.

Results

Data collection is on-going and the presentation will include preliminary results from the study.

Conclusions

Data from on-going study will be presented.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.