Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

1388P - Interim safety analysis of nivolumab 3mg/kg and ipilimumab 1mg/kg (nivo3/ipi1) in molecular-selected patients (pts) with metastastic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Sandra van Wilpe

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S616-S652. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1070

Authors

S. van Wilpe1, H. Westdorp1, I.S..H. Kloots1, P. Slootbeek1, M. den Brok1, G. Adema2, L. Kerkmeijer2, R.J. Smeenk2, M. Coskunturk1, H. Bloemendal1, J. Schalken3, N. Van Erp4, W.R. Gerritsen1, N. Mehra1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 2 Department Of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 3 Urology Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 4 Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1388P

Background

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is approved for mCRPC pts with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) of > 10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). More pts may benefit, particular those with DNA damage repair alterations and moderately elevated TMB. In mCRPC, nivo/ipi is more effective than monotherapy, but the applicability of nivo1/ipi3 is limited by its toxicity. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of nivo3/ipi1 in molecular-selected pts. Here, we present the results of a preplanned interim safety analysis.

Methods

In this single arm, phase II trial, 75 molecular-selected mCRPC pts will be included, all ECOG performance status 0-1. Molecular selection criteria comprise dMMR, non-synonymous TMB >7 mut/Mb, BRCA2 and CDK12 inactivation. The main study cohort (A1, n=50) consists of ICB-naïve pts with RECIST1.1 measurable disease. Safety is evaluated in cohorts A1, A2 (non-measurable disease) and B (prior ICB monotherapy). Pts are treated with nivo3/ipi1 Q3W for 4 cycles, followed by nivo 480 mg Q4W up to 1 year. Primary endpoint is disease control rate at 6 months. This interim analysis was performed in 25 pts with ≥ 17 weeks of follow up and aimed at < 35% toxicity-related discontinuations before week 17.

Results

The first 25 pts initiated treatment (Tx) between January and November 2021. Median number of prior CRPC Txs was 1 [range 0-5]. At data cut off, the median duration of study Tx was 128 days [range 21-371]. Tx-related AEs (TRAEs) led to discontinuation in 5 pts (20%). Four pts (16%) discontinued before week 17. Median number of combination doses was 3 [range 1-4]. Thirteen pts (52%) did not receive all 4 combination doses due to TRAEs (n=6, 24%) or disease progression (n=7, 28%). TRAEs of any grade occurred in 24 pts (96%; grade 3–4: 10, 40%). The most common grade 3–4 TRAEs were increases in ALAT, ASAT and GGT (n=3 for each, 12%) and decreases in lymphocyte count (n=4, 16%). There were no Tx-related deaths. PSA declines ≥50% were seen in 13 pts (52%) across molecular subgroups. Four pts (25%) showed an objective response.

Conclusions

Nivo3/ipi1 showed an acceptable safety profile in this interim analyses in mCRPC pts.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04717154, EudraCT 2020-001240-25.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Radboud University Medical Center.

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb Company.

Disclosure

M. den Brok: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Tagworks Pharmaceuticals, ERC immunotherapeutics. J. Schalken: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MDxHealth; Financial Interests, Personal, Other: Bayer. W.R. Gerritsen: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, IMS Health, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bayer, Astellas; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: MSD, BMS. N. Mehra: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Astellas, JNJ; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Astellas, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Janssen, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Head of the Prostate Cancer Working group: Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Co-PI: Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure (Netherlands); Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role: Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Registry. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.