Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1619P - Transition to a virtual cancer multidisciplinary team meeting during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experience from a regional Irish Cancer Centre

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer;  Gastrointestinal Cancers;  Genitourinary Cancers

Presenters

Caitriona Goggin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S1129-S1163. 10.1016/annonc/annonc713

Authors

C.M. Goggin, N. Myo Oo, M. Hennessy, M. Hamid, P. Lynch, M. O'Connor, A. Horgan, P.M. Calvert, E. Jordan, J. Greene

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, X91 ER8E - Waterford/IE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1619P

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed how healthcare services are provided. In order to comply with public health recommendations, the multidisciplinary team (MDT) network of the South East Cancer Centre at University Hospital Waterford made a transition to a virtual meeting format. The centre coordinates a network of eight individual cancer MDTs with three satellite hospitals. Following adaptation to virtual format, remote participants now join by videoconference, telephone call, or by phone application.

Methods

A 30-part questionnaire was developed in electronic format and distributed to consultants who comprise the senior membership of the cancer MDTs. The objectives were to investigate experience of the virtual meetings post-implementation, and assess preference regarding the future of the meetings.

Results

Among 36 respondents, surgeons accounted for 38.9%, medical oncologists (22.2%), pathologists (13.9%), radiologists (11.1%), haematologists (5.6%) and radiation oncology, palliative care and physicians for 2.8% each. The most common means of joining the meeting included videoconference (61.1%), physical attendance at MDT room (19.4%), telephone (11.4%) and by phone application (8.3%). 67% experienced difficulties using the technology including issues connecting (67%) and screen-sharing (50%). 78% reported that the virtual format did not affect their attendance at MDT, with 11% reporting increased attendance. 56% thought the case discussion at the virtual MDT was not as in-depth as the conventional MDTs, but a majority (81%) believe that decisions made are not impacted by the virtual format. 71% believe it has negatively impacted on education. Most respondents (40%) preferred the traditional face-to-face format, with 37% preferring a combination of virtual and face-to-face. The majority of consultants determine that virtual MDTs should continue past social distancing guidelines.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that virtual MDT meetings can be implemented into routine MDT practice. Although challenges are encountered, transition to a virtual format enables continuation of MDT meetings in uncertain times and may become a lasting legacy of COVID-19.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

C.M. Goggin.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.