Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

706P - Real-world study assessing physician rationale for initiating first-line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) therapy for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (aUC)

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Mayank Ajmera

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S678-S724. 10.1016/annonc/annonc675

Authors

M. Ajmera1, J. Chang2, A. Hitchens1, M. Kearney3, E. Esterberg1, R. Kim4, J. Cappelleri5, G. Devgan6, N. Costa7, S. Candrilli8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, 27709 - Research Triangle Park/US
  • 2 Oncology, Phi, Rlio Heor, Pfizer, 10017 - New York/US
  • 3 Global Evidence & Value Development, Merck KGaA, 64293 - Darmstadt/DE
  • 4 Oncology, Heor, Pfizer, 10017 - New York/US
  • 5 Biostatistics, Pfizer, 06340 - Groton/US
  • 6 Oncology, Pfizer, 10017 - New York/US
  • 7 Global Oncology, Pfizer, 2740-271 - Porto Salvo/PT
  • 8 Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, 06340 - Research Triangle Park/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 706P

Background

1L platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with aUC, with avelumab maintenance recommended for patients with disease control. In patients ineligible for cisplatin-containing therapy (cis ineligible) and with tumors that are PD-L1+ or platinum ineligible (US only), 1L IO treatment is an option. This study assessed physician rationale for initiating 1L IO treatment for patients with aUC.

Methods

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted by oncologists in patients ≥18 years who initiated 1L IO between 1 January 2017 and 31 May 2019. Oncologists provided rationale for treating with 1L IO and criteria for considering a patient cis ineligible, with the option to select multiple responses. Descriptive analyses were conducted.

Results

A total of 38 US and 35 UK oncologists (average 14.5 years of clinical practice) contributed data from records of 249 eligible patients (98 US; 151 UK). Cis ineligibility was the most common reason for selecting 1L IO therapy, followed by platinum ineligibility and PD-L1+ status. Oncologists selected both cis ineligible and PD-L1+ as the reasons for initiating 1L IO in only 3.1% patients in the US and 5.3% in the UK. PD-L1+ was selected as a reason for initiating 1L IO in 56.2% (US) and 33.1% (UK) of patients who tested PD-L1+ (73 US; 121 UK). Renal dysfunction was the most common criteria for determining cis ineligibility. Table: 706P

Top 3 unique reasons for selecting 1L IO and cis ineligibility criteria

Reasons for selecting 1L IO US, % (n=98) UK, % (n=151)
Cis ineligible 27.6 43.1
Platinum ineligible (cis and carboplatin ineligible) 25.5 22.5
PD-L1+ prior to treatment 21.4 11.3
Cis ineligibility criteria (n=68) (n=124)
Renal dysfunction 26.5 46.8
Renal dysfunction and poor performance status 8.8 10.5
Neuropathy* 7.4 4.0

*Neuropathy was the fourth most common reason in the UK behind “renal dysfunction and cardiovascular dysfunction” (4.8%).

Conclusions

This study found that criteria for determining cis ineligibility in real-world settings are consistent with published literature and, together with carboplatin ineligibility, are the main drivers of 1L IO prescribing. PD-L1 testing is mandatory per label and would have been expected to be the primary reason with cis ineligibility for selecting 1L IO. Future research should evaluate the criteria to determine platinum ineligibility, as it seems to impact physician treatment decision-making.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Pfizer and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

Pfizer and Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Disclosure

M. Ajmera: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: RTI International. J. Chang: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bayer. A. Hitchens: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Signant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: RTI Health Solutions. M. Kearney: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck KGaA; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Merck KGaA; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: UCB Biopharma SPRL. E. Esterberg: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: RTI International. R. Kim: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Exelixis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: BMS. J. Cappelleri: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. G. Devgan: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. N. Costa: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer. S. Candrilli: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: RTI Health Solutions.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.