Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

84P - Metastatic mismatch repair deficiency cancers: Hard to find, but a delight to treat!

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Amit Rauthan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S382-S406. 10.1016/annonc/annonc686

Authors

A. Rauthan1, N.Y. Murthy2, P. Patil2, S. Sampige Prasannakumar3, S. Zaveri3, G.R. Nigade2, P. VUNDEMODALU1, R. ashwath1, C. JOMI1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 3 Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 84P

Background

Metastatic cancers with mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, seen especially in cancers of the uterus and gastrointestinal tract, are rare and seen in about 5% of patients. They show very good and durable response to treatment with immunotherapy, leading to a tumor agnostic approval in this indication. There is very limited data of MMR deficient patients treated with immunotherapy from India.

Methods

This is a single center, retrospective study of patients with metastatic mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency cancers who received immunotherapy. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Between Jan 2018 to Jan 2021, 166 metastatic cancer patients were tested for MMR deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The primary site was colon in 80, stomach in 54, uterus in 32 patients; and out of these, 4,6,7 patients respectively had MMR deficiency (17 patients=10.2%). 14 MMR deficient patients who had progressed on at least one line of chemotherapy received immunotherapy with either nivolumab or pembrolizumb. There were 7 males and 7 females. The median age was 58 years (37-81 years). 6 had carcinoma stomach, 6 had uterine cancer and 2 had colon cancer. 7 patients received immunotherapy as second line, 6 as third line and 1 as fourth line treatment. The number of immunotherapy cycles ranged from 2 to 50. 9 patients had a partial response, 1 had stable disease and 4 had progression by recist criteria. The ORR was 64%. The median PFS was 18 months (2-38 months) and median OS was 22 months. 4 patients have crossed 2 years without progression, and 2 patients have crossed 3 years without progression.

Conclusions

MMR deficient metastatic cancers are uncommon and are seen in 10% of patients in our study. MMR testing by IHC is an easy, quick and cost-effective test for picking up this population. Immunotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab showed a high ORR and durable response in our patients. The median PFS of 18 months and median OS of 22 months was better than historical controls, inspite of immunotherapy being given in second line and beyond setting. It is imperative that we check every metastatic cancer for MMR deficiency, as this patient population, even though rare, has the potential to become long term survivors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Amit Rauthan.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Rauthan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Cipla. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.