Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

1163P - Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: Clinical characteristics, prognosis and postoperative management

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Baohui Han

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S931-S938. 10.1016/annonc/annonc727

Authors

B. Han, Z. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, F. Qian, Y. Zhang, M. Hu, W. Zhang

Author affiliations

  • Respiratory Dept., Shanghai Chest Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200030 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1163P

Background

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (C-LCNEC) is pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) mixed with other components, such as adenocarcinoma (AD), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), etc. The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of C-LCNEC remain unclear. This study aimed to describe the distinct features between C-LCNEC with different components and explore the treatment strategy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data of 114 C-LCNEC patients who underwent surgically resection and analyzed their clinical characteristics and prognosis.

Results

In our final cohort, 82 (72%) were LCNEC combined with adenocarcinoma (LCNEC/AD), while 32 (28%) were LCNEC combined with squamous cell carcinoma (LCNEC/SCC). LCNEC/AD was more likely to occur in female, younger adults, with visceral pleural invasion and with driver gene expression. However, univariate analysis showed no significant difference in DFS and OS between them (P=0.837 and P=0.852), while adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.001 and P=0.003) and preoperative CEA level (P=0.026 and P=0.009) were independent predictors. C-LCNEC patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had longer DFS and OS, including stage I patients (P = 0.006 and P = 0.031), and the benefit of etoposide-based chemotherapy in stage II or III patients was greater than the other regimens (P = 0.038 and P=0.020). EGFR and ALK mutations were present in 5.8% (17/66) and 6.1% (4/66) of C-LCNEC patients, respectively, and they responded well to targeted therapy.

Conclusions

LCNEC/AD was the most common type of C-LCNEC, and there were many differences between different combined components. Adjuvant chemotherapy, especially etoposide-based chemotherapy, was a beneficial option for resected C-LCNEC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.