Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

48P - (BREGO) Regorafenib combined with modified m-GEMOX in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): A phase II randomized trial

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Clinical Research;  Rare Cancers

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Eric Assenat

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S376-S381. 10.1016/annonc/annonc685

Authors

E. Assenat1, J.F. Blanc2, M. Bouattour3, L. Gauthier1, Y. Touchefeu4, F. Portales1, C. Borg5, N. Fares6, L. Mineur7, J. Bleuse8, T. Mazard9

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, 34090 - Montpellier/FR
  • 2 Hge, CHU Bordeaux - Hopital St. André, 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 3 Hge, Beaujon Hospital APHP, 92110 - Clichy/FR
  • 4 Hge, CHU du Nantes - Hôtel-Dieu, 44093 - Nantes/FR
  • 5 Medical Oncology, CHRU Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz, 25030 - Besancon/FR
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Hospital Rangueil, 31400 - Toulouse/FR
  • 7 Medical Oncology, Institut Ste Catherine, 84082 - Avignon/FR
  • 8 Biostatistic, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, 34090 - Montpellier/FR
  • 9 Medical Oncology, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, 34298 - Montpellier/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 48P

Background

We have already evaluated the feasibility (Phase Ib) and the potential benefits of regorafenib (Reg) in combination with chemotherapy in BTC (BREGO-NCT02386397).

Methods

BREGO is a multicenter phase II randomized trial. This trial will assess the safety and efficacy of m-GEMOX and Reg versus m-GEMOX alone. The stratification (2:1) of the 63 planned patients will be made according to the center and tumor localization (intra- versus extra-hepatic). Reg starting dose was 160mg daily from day 1 to day 14, with fixed doses of Gem (900 mg/m2) and Ox (80 mg/m2) on day 1 and 8 followed by 2 weeks’ rest.

Results

Sixty-three patients were randomised. Median age was 62.5 [31-75], male 56%, PS 0 (59%), 62% patients had intra hepatic CCK, 21% extra hepatic CCK and 17% gallbladder carcinoma. Median duration of Reg treatment was 5.1 months [0.46-19.32]; median number of mGEMOX cycles was 7 [2-17]. The median PFS was 7.82 months (95% CI: 5.78-8.15) in Reg-mGEMOX arm, and 7.23 months (95%CI: 7.58-11.2) in mGEMOX arm (p=0.825). The ORR/DCR were 33.3%/78% and 21.7%/82.6% in the Reg-mGEMOX and mGEMOX arms, respectively. The median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 9.69-16.76) in Reg-mGEMOX arm, and 15.08 months (95%CI: 8.8-NA) in mGEMOX arm (p=0.356). In subgroup analysis no differences were seen between intrahepatic or extrahepatic primary tumour location, but in experimental arm 25/42 patients continued Reg alone beyond 4 cycles (up to 28 cycles) experienced a strong improvement in term of DCR, PFS and OS. Main toxicities were (Reg-mGEMOX/mGEMOX) G3-4 neutropenia (16.7%/26.1%), G3-4 thrombocytopenia (23.8%/17.3%), G3 diarrhoea (4.8%/8.7%), G3 peripheral neuropathy (2.4%/4.3%), G3 HTA (7.1%/0%), and G2-3 hand-foot syndrome (16.7%/0%). Ancillary studies (PK, early metabolic response on PET scanner analysis and biomarkers (FGF19, SCT1) are ongoing to identify subpopulations of interest.

Conclusions

Even if the primary endpoint on PFS is not met in BREGO phase IIR trial, it proposes an alternative and probably a highly active regimen in a subgroup of metastatic or locally advanced biliary tract cancer patients. This new regimen is feasible and warrants biomarkers of response to further target patient who benefit of Reg combination.

Clinical trial identification

BREGO-NCT02386397

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

ICM Montpellier, France.

Funding

Bayer Pharma company supported this project.

Disclosure

E. Assenat: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Roche; AstraZeneca; Ipsen; BMS; AAA; Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.