Abstract 3388
Background
The mean age at diagnosis of cervical cancer (CC) is 51 yrs old. Recommendations on cervical cancer screening has recently been implemented as a nationally organized program in France. Since 2018, women aged 25-65 yrs are now invited for a every 3 years pap smear test. It therefore appeared important to gain clearer insight into the characteristics of women who have had at least one Pap smear tests but have not returned after the recommended 3-year interval for a repeat test.
Methods
The French nationwide observational survey EDIFICE 6 was conducted online from 26 June to 28 July 2017 on 12 046 individuals (age, 18-69 yrs). Representativeness was ensured by quota sampling on age, gender, profession, and stratification by geographical area and type of urban district. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors likely to explain the non-uptake of subsequent CC screening. The present analysis included 4499 women (25-65 years) with no history of cancer.
Results
Of those who were in the target age range for CC screening, 15% (N = 671) did not return for the repeat examination within the recommended 3 years. Compared to those who were compliant with the recommendations, the population of non-compliant women was older (mean age 49.2 yrs vs 43.2 yrs). It was characterized by higher proportions of women living alone (single, widow or divorced, 40% vs 30%, P < 0.05), socially vulnerable individuals (55% vs 35%, P < 0.05), smokers (35% vs 26%, P < 0.05) and lower proportions of high socioprofessional categories (23% vs 34%, P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the items associated with non-compliance included: social vulnerability (OR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.49-2.12]), current smoking (OR = 1.54 [1.28-1.85]) and rating as “not important” the progress enabled by clinical research (OR = 1.49 [1.10-1.99]). The most frequently cited reasons for non-uptake of subsequent pap smear test were "I don’t feel concerned" (48%), “individual negligence/not a priority” (42%), reasons related to the physician (27%) or to the examination/results (22%).
Conclusions
Our findings highlight the need for novel awareness campaigns that specifically target the population which drops out CC screening (including, socially vulnerable women and smokers).
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Potentiel d’Action (France), funded by Roche.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Roche.
Funding
Roche.
Disclosure
T. de La Motte Rouge: Honoraria (self): Roche. F. Eisinger: Honoraria (self): Roche. S. Couraud: Honoraria (self): Roche. L. Greillier: Honoraria (self): Roche. C. Lhomel: Full / Part-time employment: Roche. M. Rouprêt: Honoraria (self): Roche. J. Morere: Honoraria (self): Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Scientific clarification and Linguistic correction
Resources from the same session
3907 - Exploration of efficacious alternative regorafenib regimens to manage hand-foot-skin-reaction (HFSR)
Presenter: Axel Grothey
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3958 - Quality of Life (QoL) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the Real World: Final Results of a European Survey
Presenter: Zorana Maravic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3563 - BISQUIT: A Randomized Phase II Study of the Administration of Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1184 - iSCORE: Immunotherapy Sequencing in COlon and REctal Cancer
Presenter: Fiona Turkes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3346 - Phase II study of preoperative (PREOP) chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) plus avelumab (AVE) in patients (PTS) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): The AVANA Study
Presenter: Lisa Salvatore
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3895 - A phase II study of capecitabine plus concomitant radiation therapy followed by durvalumab (MEDI4736) as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer: PANDORA study.
Presenter: Maria Aurelia Barbera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2012 - Open Label Phase III Study of Arfolitixorin vs. Leucovorin in mFOLFOX-6 for First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AGENT
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2198 - SOLSTICE, a phase 3, randomized, open label study of trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (bev) versus capecitabine+bev for the 1L treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for intensive therapy
Presenter: Thierry Andre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2921 - A Phase Ib/ II Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CXD101 in Combination with the PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic, Previously-Treated, Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal Carcinoma (short title CAROSELL)
Presenter: Mark Saunders
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3695 - A Phase 1b/2 Study of Onvansertib (PCM-075) in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab for Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a KRAS Mutation
Presenter: Heinz Josef Lenz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract