Abstract 5524
Background
The widespread introduction of ICIs in patients (pts) with metastatic disease has significantly improved outcomes. However, ICIs in the elderly requires further evaluation to determine whether outcomes differ from that observed in younger cohorts. The goal of this study is to utilize real-world data from the Canadian Melanoma Research Network Registry.
Methods
This retrospective observational study was performed in metastatic pts entered into a common clinical registry and who received ipilimumab alone (ipi) and nivolumab (nivo) or pembrolizumab (pembro) from 2008 to February 2019. Demographics, extent of disease, all treatments and adverse events (AEs) were compiled. Comparisons between pts in different age cohorts were made. The potential impact of known prognostic factors was investigated using Cox proportional multivariate analyses.
Results
144 pts over 70 were treated with ICI as 1st line. 43 patients received ipi and 101 received nivo or pembro. BRAF mutation was present in 17%. Pulmonary mets: 56%; Liver mets 34%; Brain mets: 16%. For those aged 70-99, median survival was 10 M (range: 1 M - 50 M). In a comparative cohort of pts aged 50-69, the median survival was 11.8 M (range: 1 M – 78 M). On multivariate analysis age, baseline LDH and BRAF status did not impact overall survival. Within the elderly cohort, the use of ipi was associated with significantly decreased overall survival when compared to nivo and pembro (OS ipi: 6.8 M vs anti-PD1: 10.6 M). 95 pts over 70 received ICIs as 2nd line, with a median survival of 6.3 M, which was not significantly different from the younger cohort who received second-line ICIs (median survival of 8 M). In the elderly cohort, 124 >grade 2 AEs were observed: Rash 25%; Colitis: 18%; Fatigue: 8%; Asthenia: 7%.
Conclusions
ICIs can be effectively utilized in pts over 70. Survival appears to be comparable to that achieved in younger cohorts. Elderly pts who only received ipi appeared to have a worse outcome than those pts who received nivo or pembro.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Global Melanoma Research Network.
Funding
Global Melanoma Research Network.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract