Abstract 4540
Background
Introduction of PH (2012) and K (2013) in the US changed the standard-of-care for HER2-positive mBC. RW studies reported decreased K effectiveness in pts with PH pre-tx. We studied whether timing of PH and K availability in clinical practice could introduce selection bias (i.e. pts with K after PH in early yrs of availability may have to have had rapid progression during PH tx to be included in RW analyses).
Methods
Using de-identified data from the US-based Flatiron electronic health record-derived database, we selected pts diagnosed with mBC on/after 1 Jan 2011 and initiating K between 1 Feb 2013 and 31 Jul 2018. Primary analysis included all pts receiving K (any tx line). Subgroup analysis focused on pts with 2nd-line K tx after PH tx. Time from index date to next tx/death (TTNT) was used as a proxy for progression-free survival.
Results
Primary cohort (N = 533) demographics were generally consistent across yrs (2013–18); median age was 61 yrs; 89% had prior HER2-targeted tx; 23% had brain metastases (mets); 68% had visceral mets. In pts with (n = 231) vs without (n = 79) prior PH, median age was 61 vs 65 yrs, mean time from mBC diagnosis was 16 vs 18 months, 27% vs 20% had brain mets, 74% vs 58% had visceral mets. Additional findings are shown (Table). Prevalence of prior PH exposure almost doubled over the yrs. In 2nd-line K treated pts with prior PH, time from mBC to K increased over the yrs, paralleled by a numerical increase in median TTNT.Table:
356P
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary cohort (N = 533) | ||||||
N | 51 | 77 | 108 | 106 | 117 | 74 |
Prior PH, n (%) | 18 (35.3%) | 35 (45.5%) | 72 (66.7%) | 80 (75.5%) | 77 (65.8%) | 53 (71.6%) |
TTNT, median months (95% CI) | 6.8 (4.9–14.2) | 6.5 (4.2–9.2) | 7.6 (4.7–9.8) | 6.3 (5.1–8.4) | 8.4 (6.4–10.3) | Data not yet mature |
% Censored | 13.7% | 10.4% | 9.3% | 17.0% | 36.8% | |
Subgroup analysis (N = 231) | ||||||
Pts with 2nd-line K use after PH, N | 13 | 25 | 56 | 51 | 52 | 34 |
mBC to K initiation in pts with 2nd-line K use after PH, mean months (SD) | 12.7 (6.9) | 13.1 (8.5) | 13.0 (8.0) | 16.0 (12.9) | 17.9 (12.5) | 18.6 (11.6) |
TTNT in pts with 2nd-line K use after PH, median months (95% CI) | 5.1 (3.0–7.5) | 7.2 (4.6–11.7) | 6.6 (4.5–8.4) | 10.3 (5.6–12.8) | Data not yet mature | |
% Censored | 7.9% | 8.9% | 15.7% | 40.4% |
CI, confidence internal; SD, standard deviation.
Conclusions
Prevalence of PH pre-tx increased, yet K effectiveness remained consistent across yrs. With PH launched shortly before K, the initial pts receiving K were possibly selected due to shorter benefit from prior PH. This selection bias may explain reports of lower K effectiveness in pts with prior PH tx. This illustrates the challenges of assessing tx sequence effectiveness shortly after tx approval.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Writing assistance was provided by Meredith Kalish, MD, of Ashfield Healthcare Communications (a UDG Healthcare plc company), and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
T. Sanglier: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Roche. C. Flores: Full / Part-time employment: Genesis Research. E. Flahavan: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Eli Lilly; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Roche. N. Lindegger: Honoraria (self), Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Roche; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Idorsia; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: J&J. F. Montemurro: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ely Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
733 - Clinical experience: ramucirumab with FOLFIRI/XELIRI as a second line for patients with metastatic gastric cancer
Presenter: Tatiana Titova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2186 - Efficacy and safety of apatinib for the treatment of AFP-producing gastric cancer
Presenter: Ningning Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3172 - Apatinib in combination with docetaxol and S1 chemotherapy in the first line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer
Presenter: Ling Xia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3982 - Parameters of local cellular immunity in metastatic gastric cancer
Presenter: Aleksandr Sagakyants
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5102 - Germline pathogenic mutations in Chinese patients with gastric cancer identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS)
Presenter: Xiaotian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5012 - Inhibition of the PI3K pathway in HER2-positive gastric cancer
Presenter: Sinead Toomey
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4803 - Investigation on gastric cancer susceptibility genes in Chinese early-onset diffuse gastric cancer
Presenter: Yi Feng
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4778 - A correlation analysis between survival rate and the characteristic gene of gastric cancer based on bioinformatics analysis
Presenter: Yi-wen Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4805 - Phase I study of apatinib combined with POF (paclitaxel plus FOLFOX) in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve advanced gastric cancer (TNAGC)
Presenter: Rongbo LIN
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3248 - Second-line palliative systemic treatment for synchronous metastatic esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract