Abstract 899
Background
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) detection in blood is widely used to screen for prostate cancer (PCa). However, PSA has limited utility in discriminating high risk tumors (Gleason score≥7) from indolent-low risk tumors, which leads to unnecessary biopsies and highlights the need to identify better biomarkers for the detection of clinically significant PCa. GATA2 is a pioneer transcription factors which expression is increased in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but its utility in discriminating for PCa remains untested.
Methods
To determine whether extracellular vesicle (EV) GATA2 mRNA provides clinically relevant information to distinguish PCa, we prospectively analyzed non-digital rectal exam (DRE) urine EV GATA2 mRNA levels from 165 males with suspicion of PCa prior to biopsy and correlated GATA2 levels alone and combined in a multigene (PCA3 and TMPRSS2) EV mRNA assay to biopsy result.
Results
Prostate origin of GATA2 mRNA detected in urine EVs was confirmed by observing that GATA2 mRNA levels significantly dropped after prostatectomy (p < 0.05) and positively correlated to PCa tissue GATA2 mRNA levels. GATA2 increased in biopsy-positive PCa patients (p < 0.0001) and high-grade disease (p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that GATA2 is an independent predictive factor of any cancer and high-grade PCa. GATA2 alone and combined in a multigene test with PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG (GAPT-E) improved discrimination of any cancer (GAPT-E1) and high-grade cancer (GAPT-E2): standard of care (SOC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62 and 0.65, SOC plus GATA2 AUC of 0.68 and 0.69, and SOC plus GAPT-E (1-2) AUC of 0.75 and 0.75, respectively. A GAPT-E1 cut-point of 57 would avoid 25.6% of unnecessary prostate biopsies and 13.7% of total biopsies with NPV 50% and missing 9% of PCa. Limitations include lack of PCa volume and imaging assessment of the cohort.
Conclusions
Non-DRE urine EV GATA2 mRNA alone and in combination with other urine EV biomarkers in men with suspicion of PCa provides useful information to distinguish any cancer and high-risk PCa and may reduce the number of biopsies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
NCI/NIH.
Disclosure
K. Yadav: Full / Part-time employment: SEMA4. A. Tewari: Research grant / Funding (self): Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic, Inc. (10/15/2013); Licensing / Royalties: DNA Based Bicistronic Vectors with Inducible and Constitutive Promoters - ID#: 160608, High Intensity Focus Ultrasound and CPG-Brachyury-siRNA for Treatment of Prostate Cancer - ID# 160403, Patent for a Catheterless Device and Approach, Uretheral Catheter; Leadership role: Global Prostate Cancer Research Foundation, Kalyani Prostate Cancer Institute, Peter Georgescu Foundation Award, Promaxo; Advisory / Consultancy: Roivant, Siemens. W.K. Kelly: Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi, Foundation Medicine; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen Oncology; Honoraria (self): Janssen Oncology, Constellation Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi, Novartis, Janssen Oncology, Bayer, Exelixis, Seattle Genetics, Endocyte. B.E. Leiby: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. L. Gomella: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas/Janssen/Mdx Health/Strand; Research grant / Funding (self): FKD; Licensing / Royalties: Jefferson IP. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract