Abstract 2975
Background
D and E demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of mCRPC pts. Due to different antitumor mechanism of action of these agents, it could be postulated that their combination can improve disease control. CHEIRON study tried to demonstrate the candidate efficacy of chemo-hormonal combination D+E versus D in mCRPC first-line.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included mCRPC diagnosis, ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate renal, hepatic and hematological functions, no prior treatment for mCRPC. Pts were randomized to receive D 75 mg/m2 IV d1 q3w plus prednisone 5 mg PO BID for 8 courses alone or plus E 160 mg PO daily for 24 weeks. Stratification criteria were presence of pain and visceral metastases. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of pts without disease progression (according to PCWG2) at 6 mos after randomization.
Results
Between 09/2014 and 10/2017, 246 pts (median age 70 years, range 44-88, pain reported by 54 pts, visceral metastases present in 50 pts) were randomized to DE (120) or D (126). The rate of pts without disease progression at 6 mos was significantly higher in DE arm compared to D arm (89.1% vs 72.8%; p = 0.002). Similarly, a higher proportion of DE pts achieved a PSA reduction ≥ 50% compared to the baseline values compared to the D pts (92% vs 69%; p < 0.0001). No differences were observed in terms of objective response rate. Major haematological toxicities consisted of grade 3-4 neutropenia (19 pts DE – 15 pts D); febrile neutropenia was observed in 10 DE pts and in 7 D pts. At a median follow-up of 24 mos, the median progression free survival was 10.1 mos and 9.1 mos in DE and D arm, respectively (p = 0.01). In DE arm the median overall survival was 33.7 mos compared to 29.6 mos of the standard arm (p NS).
Conclusions
The present study was the first phase II randomized trial, which tested the addition of a new generation hormone agent to D compared to D alone. From this data, DE improved the 6-mo disease control with a prolongation of PFS compared to the standard chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02453009.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Astellas.
Disclosure
O. Caffo: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. D. Gasparro: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer. R. Iacovelli: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. U.F.F. De Giorgi: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi. G. Pappagallo: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genzyme; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (self): Roche. M. Aglietta: Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): PharmaMar; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Tesaro. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3469 - Ancillary evaluation of systemic immune antitumor response (SIAR) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with radiotherapy (RT) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) in the phase 1 study Mel-Ipi-Rx.
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract