Abstract 3862
Background
The role of tumour mutation burden (TMB) as predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is being explored in colorectal cancer (CRC). Microsatellite instability status (MSI) is currently used to identify CRC patients who may benefit from ICI. However, TMB values vary significantly among MSI CRC. In addition, selected microsatellite stable (MSS) with high TMB might also benefit treatment with ICI.
Methods
TMB evaluation was performed with the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay (OTML, Thermofisher) on the Ion S5XL platform. Data analysis was carried out using Ion Reporter Software v5.10. TMB was calculated as the total number of non-synonymous somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels divided by number of bases sequenced. MSI status was analysed by means of the Idylla MSI assay (Biocartis), which evaluates the presence of mutations in 7 novel MSI loci.
Results
TMB analysis was performed on 106 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded CRC samples and the data were compared with the MSI results. The Idylla assay classified 68 samples as MSS and 38 samples as microsatellite instable (MSI-H). The TMB values ranged from zero to 21.22 (median: 5.005) in the MSS and from 13.42 to 204.8 in the MSI-H group (median: 25.66), with a significant difference in median values (P < 0.0001). A significant difference in TMB values was also observed when the number of mutated MSI-associated loci was ≥2 versus <2. We next correlated the presence of mutations in a group of driver genes with the TMB values. Significantly different median TMB values were registered when a BRAF (Mann Whitney p value: 0.0023) or PIK3CA mutation (p value: 0.0082) was present, but not when KRAS alterations were detected.
Conclusions
The TMB values assessed with the OTML assay strongly correlated with MSI status in CRC. However, significant heterogeneity in TMB levels were detected among both MSI and MSS tumors, suggesting that TMB testing might provide additional information on sensitivity to ICI in CRC. The correlations with driver gene alterations might help in selecting tumors to be tested for TMB.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract